Very nice and efficient team, I contacted with. The chat support is very steady and consistent. Wonderful, Definitely a lifesaver for the persons like me who are busy with their work. Good and supportive. Again thank you guys keep it up.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) submission. Solution are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. appropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. mechanical work are present, are attracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors . The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

45.0 %Application of Conclusions to Practice [InTASC: 4, 9; CEC 3, 6] No submission. Responses on applying conclusions to practice is related to assignment and submitted. Responses on applying conclusions to practice is clear and developed. Application of conclusions drawn reflects growth and development as a professional. Application of conclusions drawn reflects growth and development as a professional with an awareness of the needs of students, parents, and community.

50.0 %Reflections on Content Knowledge [InTASC: 4; CEC 3] submission done. Reflections are related to the assignment and submitted. Reflection integrate the subject matter content, connections among concepts and/or content areas, and/or tools of inquiry in an acceptable manner . Reflects on the subject matter content, connections among concepts and content areas, and tools of inquiry to create meaningful learning experiences in an acceptable manner. Thoroughly reflects on the subject matter content, connections among concepts and content areas, and tools of inquiry to create meaningful learning experiences.

10.0 %Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) done submission. reference page is included. citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are consistently used. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) submission. Template is used appropriately, or documentation format is properly followed, correctly followed. Appropriate template is used, all elements are present. Good control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is fully used. There are no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) submission. Solution is pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. appropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical creativeness attract the reader. consistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct . Prose is largely free of mechanical errors . The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose submission done. Paper fulfilled overall purpose or organizing claim. Main claim is sufficiently developed and/; purpose is clear. Main claim is clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and appropriate to the purpose. Main claim is comprehensive. The essence of the paper is of the paper clear.

35.0 %Student Recommendations submission done. Student recommendations provided detailing tiered instruction and suggested reading. adequate student recommendations provided detailing tiered instruction and suggested reading. Recommendations somewhat supported by research. Adequate student recommendations provided detailing tiered instruction and suggested reading. Recommendations supported by research. Comprehensive student recommendations provided detailing tiered instruction and suggested reading. Recommendations clearly supported by research.

1 No Evidence 0.00% 2 Nominal Evidence 69.00% 3 Unacceptable Evidence 74.00% 4 Acceptable Evidence 87.00% 5 Target Evidence 100.00% 100.0 %Criteria 35.0 %Student Evaluation submission done. Student evaluation provided to outline slope, number of words read, and tier instruction response. adequate student evaluation provided outlining slope, number of words read, and tier instruction response. Evaluation somewhat supported by research. Adequate student evaluation provided outlining slope, number of words read, and tier instruction response. Evaluation supported by research. Comprehensive student evaluation provided outlining slope, number of words read, and tier instruction response. Evaluation clearly supported by research.