Reference no: EM132426516
Question: Validity measures the usefulness of a test for specific purposes. For instance, tests of depression, such as the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), correlate well with clinician assessments of depression, so they can be considered valid measures of depression. On the other hand, the BDI does not predict job performance well, so it would be invalid for that purpose.
Types of validity include criterion-related, content, face, and construct validity. Criterion-related validity looks at the correlation between tests scores and a criterion that the test scores could be expected to predict. For instance, SAT scores for high school seniors could be expected to correlate with their first-year college GPA. Content validity generally depends on expert opinion and looks at whether the test adequately samples the content of interest. A math test for high school students should sample the types of math problems that are found in high school math textbooks and should cover the domains that high school math teachers say are important. Face validity is important, but is not validity in the technical sense. A test has face validity if it appears to measure what it purportedly measures. For instance, a math test for truck drivers should ask questions about gas mileage and load weight. If it contained questions about cake recipe proportions, it would lack face validity. Construct validity is usually accumulated over time and represents the accumulation of many validity studies. It indicates whether the test appropriately measures a theoretical construct.
For this Discussion, you concentrate on construct validity. To prepare, choose a construct to use (one that was not used in the examples), and consider how you might assess the construct validity of a measure of that construct. Then think about how the reliability of your measure might influence its validity.
With these thoughts in mind:
Post a description of the construct you selected. Then explain how you might assess the construct validity of a measure of that construct. Finally, explain the influence of reliability of your measure on the magnitude of its validity. Support your response using the Learning Resources and the current literature.
|
Review problem based on child sex offender registries
: Sex offender registries are found in each of the 50 states. In some states, registries also exist for juvenile offenders. Read the article entitled.
|
|
What are cowgirl chocolates may consider as far as pricing
: Based on this information, discuss the relative merits of using a cost-based, demand-based, and competition-based pricing method.
|
|
Identify specific leadership strategies for fostering each
: Consider factors that contribute to and detract from creativity and innovation. In addition, identify specific leadership strategies for fostering each within.
|
|
Examine the pros and cons of shared leadership
: In this Discussion, you will consider whether shared leadership would be effective in your current or former workplace. In doing so, you will examine the pros.
|
|
How you might assess the construct validity of a measure
: Post a description of the construct you selected. Then explain how you might assess the construct validity of a measure of that construct.
|
|
Discuss the main tenets of each therapy
: Write a 350- to 500- word summary on three psychotherapies. Discuss the main tenets of each therapy, their effectiveness in treating psychological disorders.
|
|
Define the term Sole Proprietorship
: Define what makes each of the following entities different from each other and explain sole proprietorship, general partnership, limited partnership
|
|
Post a brief description of an event
: Post a brief description of an event/situation that has affected a macro community. Analyze the roles and/or skills that a forensic psychology professional.
|
|
Find current non-basic variables with reduced cost
: Examine reduced costs to find current non-basic variables with 0 reduced cost. Use previous method to force entry of this variable into basis and solve again
|