Reference no: EM133940365

Question: The paper should not merely be a description or summary of what we have read and discussed. For example, a paper whose thesis is "The two sections of the Sherman Antitrust Act are [insert summary here]" or "An organization can be held liable for the acts of its volunteers in certain situations" will not receive a high mark.

Rather, each paper should make an argument about a topic we have covered: "The Sherman Antitrust Act has made professional sports more profitable for owners and players;" "An organization should not be held liable for its volunteers;" etc. Use examples we have read about or discussed in class. You must use outside research, although personal experience may be incorporated as appropriate. Having said that, though, please bear in mind that this is a paper and not a reading response/discussion.

The final product represents an authentic demonstration competency, because it requires students to synthesize a range of course readings to develop and support a reasoned, informed argument. Get the best assignment help from top tutors.

The project is divided in to four milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules 3, 5, 7, and 9.

Main Elements
Written components of projects must follow these formatting guidelines when applicable: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and discipline-appropriate citations.

Failure to adhere to these requirements of submission will result in the paper not being graded.

Keep the following questions and elements in mind when completing you papers:

How well do you establish your argument? If I can't tell that you are trying to prove that risk assessment is the most important part of risk management that will re?ect poorly on the overall quality of the paper.
How compelling is your argument? If you try to prove that oral contracts should be the norm in sports law, but end up convincing me that in no circumstances should oral contracts ever be used, that will have a negative impact on your grade. That is not to say that you should pick an easy-to-argue thesis. I will respond better to an unlikely argument that is well made than I will to an easy argument that is badly made.
How well did you use examples from class? This paper is an opportunity to show off that you've been paying attention to the reading and class discussions. Bring up cases, scenarios, teams, players, etc. that we have talked about to effectively prove your point.
How well do you use and demonstrate the information, theories, etc. that we covered in class? Remember that I am primarily interested in determining how much you have learned in this class. When you use cases, be sure to accurately state the ideas they represent.
Did you use proper grammar and spelling? This is a formal paper, not an informal reading response. Outlines, sentence fragments, and bullet points are not appropriate. Please watch subject- verb agreement.