Presentation (a) Structure (b) Referencing (c) Use of Language (a) Excellent structure and presentation (a) Excellent structure and presentation (b) Precise, full and appropriate references and notes. (b) Precise, full and appropriate references and notes. (c) Subtle use of language expressing highly nuanced thought with clarity and precision to a level appropriate for submission for publication. (c) Precise use of language expressing complex thought with clarity, accuracy and precision which furthers and enhances the argument

Criteria Pass Grades High Distinction 85-100% Distinction 70-84% The work displays: The work displays: gathered to support the argument. support and further the argument Argument (continued) (d) Independent Research (d) Evidence of an innovative or original use of extensive personal research which has been thoroughly critically evaluated both conceptually and methodologically (d) Substantial research and evidence of an innovative use of a wide range of personal research with clear and consistent critical evaluation both conceptually and methodologically

Argument (a) Analysis, Synthesis & Evaluation (b) Numerical Analysis (c) Argumentation (d) Independent Research (a) Consistently precise, accurate and reasoned analysis, synthesis and/or evaluation; addressing issues with insight or originality (a) Consistently precise, accurate and reasoned analysis, synthesis and/or evaluation addressing all issues, some with creativity (b) Numeric analysis that is complete and free from errors with application of methods that may be insightful or original (b) Numeric analysis that is complete and mostly free from errors with fluent and appropriate application of methods. (c) Extremely strong and consistent argument making a convincing whole with evidence of originality. Impressive dexterity in the use of information (c) Extremely strong and consistent argument that convincingly addresses issues including uncertainties and conflicts. Excellent use of information gathered which to

Criteria Pass Grades High Distinction 85-100% Distinction 70-84% The work displays: The work displays: Knowledge & Understanding (a) Systematic Understanding (b) Emerging Thought (a) Strong evidence of a comprehensive and systematic understanding of an extensive range of appropriate issues, concepts, theories and research (a) Clear evidence of a comprehensive and systematic understanding of a considerable variety of issues, concepts, theories and research (b) Sustained excellence in the application of thoughts and practices at the forefront of the discipline (b) Precise and well judged application of thoughts and practices at the forefront of the discipline

2. Enterprise 2.0 1. Strong and consistent argument that analyses motivators and challenges that may be faced by an employee facing enterprise 2.0 technology (20) 2. Excellent performance will draw on examples from practice that illustrate issues, concepts, theories and research on the role of managers in applying Enterprise 2.0 for knowledge management practices within an organisation.(25) Max 45 Structure, referencing, use of language including use of Harvard Referencing System Max 10 Total 100 marks

Written Individual Assessment Marking Guide The assignment is marked out of 100. The following table shows the mark allocation. Section Content Marks Intro Please note there are zero marks for the introduction which is expected to be a simple and brief overview of what you are discussing in your document. A suggestion of no more than 250 words. 1. Cloud 1. Evidence of an original use of appropriate research material related to Cloud Based ERP or CRM systems from a wide range of sources. (9) 2. Critical appraisal of research on practices and theories related to Cloud Based ERP or Cloud Based CRM systems (12) 3. Evidence of comprehensive understanding of a range of contemporary issues and concepts raised in the research (12) 4. Quality, consistency and originality of argument including appropriate use and of information gathered in support of argument (12) Max 45

Group Presentation Marking Guide Organization: Title, introduction & outline, logical structure, summary. 20 Visuals: Legible text, figures, aesthetic quality where appropriate 20 Delivery Clear speech, connection to material 20 Timing keeping to time, pace 20 Content understandable, logical progression, relevance 20 Total 100 Marks

For this level, a minimum of 15-20 references is required as evidence of broader reading. References must be cited using the Harvard Referencing Style. Any figures or graphs used in the report must have captions and, wherever needed, properly referenced. All other instructions in general assessment guidance need to be followed.

Assessment submission structure The assignment has the role of a professional report and it should be one. It must, at the minimum, include: • Title page • Table of contents • Introduction • Main section(s) Use the marking scheme sections as a guide • References • Appendixes (if relevant) The references should include academic, web-based and professional sources. It is important to show that you understand the limitations of the web sources and appreciate the significance of the professional and academic ones. This is reflected in the number and the quality of the used sources.

1) Read the questions thoroughly. 2) There are a total of 100 Marks for the written assessment. A mark of 50% or greater is required to pass the assessment. 3) You will need to provide evidence of your research to support your arguments, (avoid using a lot of internet sites). 4) It will not be sufficient to just write a descriptive report, no matter how good an account you provide. It is important, therefore, that you draw on and refer to appropriate theory for your critique.

• Please use English (UK) as your language in the submission. • Do not put your name or contact details anywhere on your submission. You should only put your student identification number (SRN) which will ensure your submission is recognised in the marking process. • A total of 100 marks are available for this module assessment and you are required to achieve a minimum of 50% to pass this module. • You are required to use only Harvard Referencing in your submission. Any content which is already published by other author(s) and is not referenced will be considered as a case of plagiarism. • The University College has a very strict policy regarding plagiarism and in proven instances of plagiarism or collusion, severe punishment will be imposed on offenders. You are advised to read the rules and regulations regarding plagiarism and collusion in the GAR and MOPP which are available on VLE in the Academic registry section.

• Your summative assessment for Knowledge Management and Information Systems Strategy (BMT7026) is a Coursework submission. • The deadline for submission is 04:00 PM. • You are required to submit your assessment via Turnitin online access. Only submissions made via the specified mode will be accepted and hard copies or any other digital form of submissions (like via email or pen drive etc.) will not be accepted. • For coursework, the submission word limit is 2,500 words. You must comply with the word count guidelines. You may submit LESS than 2500 words but not more. Tables, diagrams, bibliography, appendices and headings are NOT included within word count calculations. You must specify total word count on the front page of your report. Submission over the word count will not be marked. For coursework, please use font size 12 for body text and the typeface (font) should be Arial or Times New Roman with minimum 1.5 spacing. For headers and titles, please use font size 14. Your submission must have standard margins and page numbers.