D1. Culpability Factors A discussion is not provided, or the discussion makes no reference to culpability factors that are used to determine fines under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. The discussion is logical and accurately addresses 3 culpability factors that are used to determine fines under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. E. Sources The submission does not include both in-text citations and a reference list for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are properly quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list that accurately identifies the author, date, title, and source location as available. F. Professional Communication Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic.

B2. Whistleblowing Process A description was not provided, or the description makes no reference to the process the employee should follow if the employee decided to blow the whistle. The description of the process the employee should follow if the employee decided to blow the whistle is logical and accurate. C. Advantages and Disadvantages of Paying Whistle Blowers An analysis was not provided, or the analysis makes no reference to the advantages and disadvantages of paying whistle-blowers. The analysis is logical, appropriately details both the advantages and disadvantages of paying whistle-blowers, and specifically references current laws. D. Impact of U.S. sentencing Guidelines An analysis is not provided, or the analysis makes no reference to the impact the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines might have on an organization. The analysis is logical and appropriately details the impact the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines might have on an organization.

A4A. Available Resources A description was not provided, or the description makes no reference to any of the resources available to employees. The description logically addresses 3 resources available to employees, and includes key details. A4B. Preferred Resources A discussion was not provided, or the discussion makes no reference to which resources the candidate would most likely use. The discussion logically addresses which resources the candidate would most likely use and is well supported. A5. Code of Ethics The code of ethics the candidate analyzed is not included in a separate document. The code of ethics the candidate analyzed is included in a separate document. B1. Whistleblowing Conditions A discussion was not provided, or the discussion makes no reference to the factors that would need to be considered before an employee blows the whistle about unethical conduct observed at work. The discussion about factors that would need to be considered before an employee blows the whistle about unethical conduct observed at work is logical, and the ideas presented are well supported.

A2B. Legal or Ethical Safeguards A description is not provided, or the description makes no reference to legal or ethical safeguards. The description addresses 2 legal or ethical safeguards, contains sufficient detail, and is logical, and relevant to the chosen company. A3. Development of an Ethical Culture An analysis of the code of ethics is not provided or the analysis makes no reference to facilitating the development of an ethical culture. The analysis explains whether the code of ethics facilitates the development of an ethical culture, and the ideas presented are logical and well supported. A4. Raising an Ethical Concern An explanation is not provided, or the explanation makes no reference to how an employee would raise an ethical concern in the company. The explanation addresses how an employee would raise an ethical concern in the company, and the ideas presented are logical and include key details.

Paper 3 Rubric NOT EVIDENT COMPETENT A1. Corporate Social Responsibility An analysis of the code of ethics is not provided or the analysis makes no reference to whether the code of ethics is lacking in corporate social responsibility. The analysis explains whether the code of ethics is lacking in the area of corporate social responsibility and the ideas presented are logical and well supported. A2. Legal Mandate Compliance An analysis of the code of ethics is not provided, or the analysis makes no reference to compliance with legal mandates. The analysis addresses whether the code of ethics is lacking in compliance with legal mandates, and the ideas presented are logical and well supported. A2A. Implications of Noncompliance A description is not provided, or the description makes no reference to the implications of being noncompliant with legal mandates. The description of the implications of being noncompliant with legal mandates is logical and the implications described are accurate and relevant to the legal mandates.

Ethical Leadership and Code of Ethics - The Student identifies influences on ethical leadership and analyzes a code of ethics. Policy and Program Development - The Student develops policies, practices, procedures, and programs that foster organizational ethics and socially responsible behavior. Legal and Regulatory Requirements - The Student analyzes applicable legal and regulatory requirements to determine whether organizations meet legal responsibilities.