Explain the divine command theory

Reference no: EM13520560

Explain the divine command theory and explain the three objections to this theory that proceed on the assumption that god does not have a reason for commanding what it commands. Also discuss the "Euthyphro argument" against this theory and explain how it is supposed to work . Be sure to discuss how the second premise of this argument might be modified in an attempt to avoid rejecting the divine command theory. Does the attempt succeed?

Reference no: EM13520560

Questions Cloud

Distinguishing between seeming and actual memory : Why does Weirob think that on the view of a person that Miller introduces at the beginning of the Second Night of the dialogue it is necessary to have a criterion for distinguishing between seeming and actual memory

Body and soul by appealing to psychological characteristics : How does Miller attempt to establish an empirical connection between the body and the soul by appealing to "psychological characteristics"? Does this attempt succeed? Explain. At the beginning of The Second Night of the Dialogue Concerning Persona..

Weirob formulates to establish the conclusions : Present the argument that Weirob formulates to establish the conclusions that we are not judging of immaterial souls in our judgments about personal identity and that identity of persons does not consist in identity of souls.

Explain why weirob rejects millers suggestion : Explain why Weirob rejects Miller's suggestion that it is conceivable that Weirob will survive her bodily death because it is easy to conceive that there should be someone "exactly similar" to Weirob in the "Hereafter."

Explain the divine command theory : Explain the divine command theory and explain the three objections to this theory that proceed on the assumption that god does not have a reason for commanding what it commands.

In the Euthyphro-Socrates presents two arguments : In the Euthyphro. Socrates presents two arguments to prove that the pious and the god-beloved are not the same. Describe both of these arguments and explain why the good one works and the bad one fails to work

Explain aquinas cosmological argument : Clearly state and explain aquinas cosmological argument for the existence of God. for the most part its third premise is the most problematic. explain how Craig employs the distinction between actual and potential infinites to defend Aquinas here.

Explain the ecidential porblem of evil : Explain the ecidential porblem of evil. how does its conclusion differ from that of the logical porblem? explaib three of the theodicies offered in the response to the problem

Explain the logical problem of evil argument : Clearly explain the logical problem of evil argument. What does it conclude? what is the logical problem? in addition, explain Plantinga's theistic defense of the problem. what is a possible objection to Plantinga's defense?

User Account

All Pages