Explain how you would implement your evaluation design

Assignment Help Other Subject

Reference no: EM131653009

Assignment

At the heart of any evaluation is the evaluation design. It is now common consensus in policy evaluation that no amount of sophisticated analysis can repair a poorly designed study. There is no such thing as a perfect evaluation design and there are always tradeoffs. One of the most important tradeoffs has to do with internal and external validity. This is true whether you are doing a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods evaluation.

For this Assignment, review this week's Learning Resources and begin the process of developing your evaluation design by outlining its main features.

Submit a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:

• Explain how you would implement your evaluation design within an official policy evaluation. Be sure to include specific examples from the course readings, academic research and professional experience. Provide a rationale for your implementation choices, including examples and references.

• Explain how you would address validity threats, particularly internal validity (plausible rival hypothesis). Provide a rationale for these plans, including any expected outcomes, using examples and references.

• Langbein, L. (2012). Public program evaluation: A statistical guide (2nd ed.). Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.

o Chapter 2, "Defensible Program Evaluations: Four Types of Validity" (pp. 26-50)
o Chapter 3, "Internal Validity: The Logic of Internal Validity" (pp. 51-72)

• McDavid, J. C., Huse, I., & Hawthorn, L. R. L. (2013). Program evaluation and performance measurement: An introduction to practice (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

o Chapter 3, "Research Designs for Program Evaluations" (pp. 89-144)

• United States Government Accountability Office (USGAO). (2012). Designs for assessing program implementation and effectiveness. In Designing evaluations: 2012 revision (pp. 31-49).

• Cook, T. D., Scriven, M., Coryn, C. L. S., & Evergreen, S. D. H. (2009). Contemporary thinking about causation in evaluation: A dialogue with Tom Cook and Michael Scriven. American Journal of Evaluation, 31(1), 105-117.

• The World Bank. (2011). Evaluation designs.

Reference no: EM131653009

Questions Cloud

Discuss intervention be different from normal hearing : How would the sound we perceive with this intervention be different from normal hearing

Watch her intake of saturated fats : Sally is trying to eat healthier and watch her intake of saturated fats. Which of the following oils would be the best choice for Sally to use when she cooks?

Incredible influence in latent fingerprints : Biology is in fact an incredible influence in latent fingerprints. While learning this EXPLAIN IN DETAIL

Find a level workforce plan that relies just on overtime : Find a level workforce plan that relies just on overtime and the minimum amount of undertime possible. What is the total cost of the? plan?

Explain how you would implement your evaluation design : Explain how you would implement your evaluation design within an official policy evaluation. Provide a rationale for your implementation choices.

Discuss one of the synapse types- inhibitory gaba-ergic : Discuss one of the following synapse types: excitatory cholinergic, inhibitory GABA-ergic, or excitatory adrenergic

Incidence and manifestations of acute : What are the pathophysiological factors that influence the incidence and manifestations of acute, episodic, and chronic disease of hypertension across?

Identifying the evolutionary change of antibiotic : Need an essay identifying the evolutionary change of antibiotic/antimicrobial usage towards the treatment of diseases throughout the history of medicine

Prepare organisms for future events : If natural selection has no foresight, how can it explain features that seem to prepare organisms for future events?

User Account

All Pages