Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
I want to look at the evolution vs. Intelligent Design (ID) debate.As some of you may remember, back in 2005, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania heard a case relating to the teaching of Intelligent Design in high school.Here's the background:On October 18, 2004, the Dover (Pennsylvania) Area School Board of Directors passed by a 6-3 vote the following resolution:"Students will be made aware of gaps/problems in Darwin's theory and of other theories of evolution including, but not limited to, intelligent design."On November 19, 2004, the Dover Area School District announced by press release that, starting in January 2005, teachers would be required to read the following statement to students in the ninth grade biology class at Dover High School:"The Pennsylvania Academic Standards require students to learn about Darwin's Theory of Evolution and eventually to take a standardized test of which evolution is a part. Because Darwin's Theory is a theory, it continues to be tested as new evidence is discovered. The Theory is not a fact. Gaps in the Theory exist for which there is no evidence. A theory is defined as a well-tested explanation that unifies a broad range of observations. Intelligent Design is an explanation of the origin of life that differs from Darwin's view. The reference book, Of Pandas and People, is available for students who might be interested in gaining an understanding of what Intelligent Design actually involves. With respect to any theory, students are encouraged to keep an open mind. The school leaves the discussion of the Origins of Life to individual students and their families. As a Standards-driven district, class instruction focuses upon preparing students to achieve proficiency on Standards-based assessments."*A group of local parents took the Dover School Board of Directors to court. In December, 2005, the United States District Court for the Middle District Of Pennsylvania found against the Dover School Board of Directors, judging it unconstitutional to include a statement such as theirs as a mandatory part of the curriculum for high school science classes, and also finding the teaching of Intelligent Design in high school science classes to be unconstitutional.***So... what do you think of the court's decision?
children are as intellectually as able as adults, his studies might have used questions too difficult for children and therefore underestimated their competency.
Research and associated textual evidence drawn from a range of hospitality, tourism and leisure businesses and organizations
Continuing with the developement of the marketing plan, in this section you address the various aspects for store location.
The Schizophrenic Co. was organized in Delaware, but all of its business is done in France, the managerial offices are located in Luxembourg and its board of directors holds its meetings in Luxembourg
Posttraumatic stress disorders. Salina was terrified during the San Francisco earthquake of 1989 (who wouldn't be?). For a couple of weeks after, she did not sleep well or feel comfortable inside a building. However, gradually the fears diminished,..
When O'Brien says 'You have failed in humility and self discipline,' he is correct. Winston Smith causes his own suffering. Do you agree? I have NO IDEA what to talk about, I don't even understand the prompt,
Intercultural communication situations,use an example of when someone else nonverbally communicated something to you that was different than what they meant. What happened in this situation
Explain the eight basic perspectives used to define "personality".
Write and label variables in following situation. Describe the relationships among variables and show these in diagram. Failure to follow accounting principles causes immense confusion.
SALT II, START III talk about the provisions - explain why they failed and how do realism and constructivism relate to each treaty and why they failed - give examples of empirical evidence
Discuss the concept of establishment of religion and the relevancy of Zorach v. Clauson.
Construct an inductive argument for a specific conclusion. Then, explain what you might do to make this inductive argument stronger, either by revising the premises or by revising the conclusion.
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +1-415-670-9521
Phone: +1-415-670-9521
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd