Reference no: EM133239484

Question - Jean Claude Biver Case Analysis Discussion

Instructions - Although I will not assign a number of words or paragraphs, your responses should be thorough and specific. You should consider multiple perspectives and evaluate strengths and weaknesses.

In your responses, please do not restate the facts of the case. Keep in mind that I am familiar with the case, and you need only to mention facts that are relevant to (and support) your analysis or recommendation as you need them. Rather, use the information in the case to illustrate your statements, to defend your arguments, or to make salient points.

You must avoid being descriptive; instead, you must be analytical. You are obliged to offer analysis and evidence to back up your conclusions. Do not rely on unsupported opinions, over-generalizations, and platitudes as a substitute for tight, logical argument backed up with facts and figures.

Please write in a formal manner suitable for scholarly work, rather than a letter to a friend.

Do not use any direct quotes or bullet points.

In general, your paper should be double-spaced, 12 point, Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins, with no grammar or spelling errors.

Format: State the question followed by your response.

1) Does Biver's story serve as a model of effective leadership or serve as cautionary tale?

2) Has the case challenged your assumptions about leadership and change and/or how to inspire others to adopt a vison?

3) Do you possess any qualities and/or behaviors that allow you to see the world differently than those around you? If not, do you wish you did? Why or why not? What qualities or behaviors do you believe would allow you to see the world differently than those around you?

4) Are you passionate about your work? Why or why not? If someone were to ask you how can they find their passion, what would you tell them?