Discuss how this theory might contribute to understanding

Assignment Help Other Subject

Reference no: EM133744390

Case: In the article provided in the readings for this unit, "Explanations of Research Misconduct, and How They Hang Together" by Haven and van Woudenberg (2021), the authors explore various explanations for research misconduct, particularly falsification and fabrication. They argue that understanding these explanations requires considering factors such as the beliefs and motivations of the researcher, the context in which the misconduct occurs, and potential unconscious biases.

Based on what we have learned in our course about the steps in the research cycle, each learner will write an APA-formatted essay with APA heading sections that answer specific questions.

Read the Haven and van Woudenberg (2021) article carefully and write an essay addressing the following points:

Summarize the key arguments presented by Haven and van Woudenberg (2021) regarding the explanations for research misconduct.
Analyze at least two of the specific explanations they discuss (e.g., Rational Choice Theory, Bad Apple Theory, General Strain Theory, Prospect Theory, Organizational Justice Theory, New Public Management). For each explanation, address the following:
Briefly explain the core tenets of the theory.
Evaluate the theory's strengths and weaknesses in explaining research misconduct.
Discuss how this theory might contribute to understanding a specific real-world example of research misconduct (you can choose an example from the article or another relevant example).
Discuss the concept of "contextual affordances" as presented by Haven and van Woudenberg (2021). Explain how contextual factors can contribute to or facilitate research misconduct.
Consider the authors' conclusion that different explanations of research misconduct are compatible and can coexist. Explain how understanding this compatibility can be helpful in addressing and preventing research misconduct.
What are some of the most important factors to consider when explaining research misconduct? Provide a rationale for your answer, drawing upon your understanding of the article and your own critical thinking.

Reference no: EM133744390

Questions Cloud

What questions do you have and what would you like to know : Using what you have know about nursing regulations and licensure, List 3 or more questions. What questions do you have and what would you like to know?

What is the most important initial action : Upon reviewing the order, you notice a potential drug interaction with another medication patient is already taking. What is the most important initial action?

Find and analyze a series of television commercials : Find and analyze a series of television commercials. I want you to find a total of 6 television commercials, with two utilizing strategies that appeal to ethos

Create handout that a veterinary hospital may have available : Create a 1-2 page informational handout that a veterinary hospital may have available for clients with a basic introduction to the deficiency.

Discuss how this theory might contribute to understanding : Discuss how this theory might contribute to understanding a specific real-world example of research misconduct (you can choose an example from the article

Re there any uteratonic meds you would question if ordered : Based on the patients presentation and vital signs, are there any uteratonic meds you would question if ordered?

What mistakes are commonly made when estimating the wacc : What mistakes are commonly made when estimating the WACC, and how do these mistakes arise?

Identify potential reasons that might drive higher npv : Identify potential reasons that might drive higher NPV for a given project. Substantiate your response by providing an example to explain your thought process

How should the historical outcomes of u.s. : How should the historical outcomes of U.S. and U.K. government experiments with remote viewing programs influence current intelligence practices

User Account

All Pages