2. Application to future practice and relationship to competency Potential links between unit content and future standards practice very clearly Speculation on how the unit content will support future work as a public health practitioner, especially in terms of meeting competency standards articulated, with tangible example(s) of how content relates to competency standards LO1: demonstrate advanced knowledge of the different types of health determinants and their significance to public health practice LO4: Evaluate social, political, ethical, economic and ecological impacts on environmental health interventions and practice 1 (4½–5 marks)

Assessment criteria and relevant unit learning outcome(s) 1. Consideration of unit content relative to existing knowledge and skills Reflection on the extent to which unit content relates to existing knowledge/skills LO1: demonstrate advanced knowledge of the different types of health determinants and their significance to public health practice LO4: Evaluate social, political, ethical, economic and ecological impacts on environmental health interventions and practice Excellent Submission demonstrates very high level of reflection on how unit content related to existing knowledge/skills (4½–5 marks)

Length and/or format: 800 - 1000 words (excluding the reference list), written reflective piece Purpose: Analyse how the knowledge gained in this unit will influence future public health practice Learning outcomes assessed: 1, 4 In line with section 5.1 of ACU’s Assessment Policy, all assessment marking and grading must be criterion-referenced and use standards-based grading. Assessment criteria and standards are related to unit learning outcomes. Student performance on a task is evaluated against each criterion, and according to the set standards of achievement for that criterion. Assessment criteria and standards for this task are provided in the following rubric. Each criterion is marked according to a five-point standard, from “poor” to “excellent”, with a descriptor for each standard. Within each standard there is a small marking range that further differentiates the quality of student work. Your final mark for the task reflects evaluation against all criteria.