Reference no: EM132228869
Question: In this last week, you bring your skills in critically evaluating research to a final discussion of what it means for the components of a research study to be logically connected. As you recall from previous weeks, this connection refers to alignment.
You also consider the social change implications of research. Engendering positive social change is at the core of Walden University's mission. As future researchers and scholar-practitioners in your fields, you have likely had, and will continue to have, opportunities to apply your Walden learning experiences to making a difference in the lives of others.
This week, you will revisit the interrelationship among research components to determine the criteria for evaluating alignment. You will also consider the relationship between research and social change as you reflect on your newly acquired research knowledge and skills.
In the context of research, alignment and social change will be important topics to return to as you prepare for the next courses in the research sequence and continue your development as a scholar-practitioner.
Consider, for example, what criteria are used in your discipline to evaluate alignment of research components. And in what way will your future research contribute to your identity as scholar-practitioner who is dedicated to positive social change?
For this Discussion, you will consider criteria for evaluating alignment among the various components of a research study. You will also reflect on your role as a positive social change agent through research.
With these thoughts in mind:
Post an explanation of the criteria you could use to evaluate alignment between data collection methods and other research components, such as the problem, purpose, research questions, and design. Then, reflecting on the course content, discuss the extent to which your newly acquired research knowledge and skills can support your role as an agent of positive social change. Be specific and provide an example(s).
Be sure to support your Main Issue Post and Response Post with reference to the week's Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style.
Vogt, W. P., Gardner, D. C., & Haeffele, L. M. (2012). When to use what research design. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Discuss the proper accounting treatment
: Discuss the proper accounting treatment, including any required disclosures, for each situation. Give the rationale for your answers
|
Develop a methodology for assessing the possible validity
: Develop a methodology for assessing the possible validity of accusations of sexual abuse or domestic violence in the marriage as a special consideration.
|
How peers influenced the interviewee
: How peers influenced the interviewee during his or her adolescent/young adult stage. What people and/or events influenced the interviewee's development.
|
How impact of culture with regards to the way infants learn
: Discuss how the impact of culture with regards to the way infants learn, remember and conceptualize. Give an example with the inclusion of 2 comparative culture
|
Determine the criteria for evaluating alignment
: This week, you will revisit the interrelationship among research components to determine the criteria for evaluating alignment.
|
What are the neurological structures of taste
: Part 1- What are the neurological structures of taste, touch, and smell? How do taste, touch, and smell affect behavior? Provide an example in your response.
|
Describing resultant awareness of atmospheric sounds
: Part One: You'll need a timer (feature on most smarphones or online), pencil, and paper. Choose a location where you can sit for 90 seconds.
|
Compare approaches of each of the four perspectives
: Compare and contrast the approaches of each of the four perspectives (Piaget, Erikson, Skinner, and Vygotsky). Explain how each theorist would approach.
|
How development and empowerment are similar
: Think of how development and empowerment are similar and different. Consider creating a Venn diagram to help you organize your thoughts as you compare.
|