Excellent service. Customer care is good 24/7. Instant chat now service is very good. Thanks for all help punctual in time. better way to explanation. thank you so much. Thank you for this assignment. it is wonderful experience with you and give full details of assignment. thank you very much. i would like to give my assignment to you again thank you once more

i am a student of msc in nursing international. i need help to complete my assessment 2. 35% Reflection • Demonstrates critical reflection on LPI and analyses personal leadership behaviours using a supported model. • Articulate academic writing skills, highly coherent and logical flow of ideas. Exemplary spelling, grammar, and syntax. • Clear and appropriate reflection on LPI using supported model. • Strong links made to personal behaviours and leadership. • Fluent communication of information. Superior academic writing skills. Minimal errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. • Reflective model used appropriately with clear links to LPI results. • Reflection describes personal leadership behaviours. • Academic writing is fluent and relevant, clear and/or cohesive. • Simple reflection provided based on LPI results with reference to own personal leadership behaviours. • Reflection model referred to but not used to sufficiently guide analysis.

Literature Sources & referencing 10% • Extensive use of the subject key text and relevant literature. Multiple citations used to support single ideas. • References are accurate and comply with UOW referencing guideline for APA. • The subject key text and a broad range of high quality papers are used frequently to support ideas. • APA referencing style is consistently accurate. Minor, infrequent referencing errors noted. • Body of assessment uses at least 5 reverent primary research literatures including the subject key text. • APA referencing style is accurate. Minor, but frequent referencing errors noted. • Primarily reliance on subject key text with minimal other supported literature used. • APA evident but multiple errors noted. • Shows little/no evidence of subject key text and supportive literature. Relies primarily on non-reviewed and/or internet sources. • APA not evident and/or major and multiple errors.

Analysis 40% • Analysis and synthesis of the core aspects of literature are integrated with leadership development. • Eloquent academic writing skills with main subject matter developed within each paragraph. • There is a well-developed analysis and awareness of leadership development. • Evidence of superior academic writing skills with discussion in each paragraph providing sufficient depth to ensure understanding is meaningfully. • There is well reasoned argument based on broad evidence. Some evidence of analysis of leadership development and synthesis of ideas in terms of related literature. • Evidence of fluent academic writing skills with discussion in majority of paragraphs providing broad depth. • There is attempt at analysis of the literature. Leadership development shows limited understanding. • Evidence of appropriate academic writing skills with sufficient depth. • Poor or no analysis or syntheses of leadership development in health care is demonstrated.

Application of leadership theory 25% • Demonstrates deep and insightful understanding of the influence of leadership development on individuals, teams and health care services. • Multiple examples are provided and sufficiently linked to illustrate influence. • Demonstrates clear meaningful understanding of the influence of leadership on individuals, teams and health care services. • Two of more examples are provided and linked to illustrate influence. • There is clear discussion on leadership development and how this is used to influence healthcare holistically. • Two examples are used to illustrate this. • There is some discussion about leadership development, but superficial application on its influence to healthcare. • There is minimal or no example provided. • There is poor or no discussion as to how leadership development impacts healthcare. • No example provided, or applied poorly.

Criteria High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail Knowledge of leadership theory 25% • Demonstrates comprehensive overview of the leadership theory and literature. • Demonstrates insight and awareness of the deeper subtler aspects of the chosen topic. • Articulate academic writing skills, highly coherent and logical flow of ideas. Exemplary spelling, grammar, and syntax. • Evidence of an awareness and understanding of deeper and more subtle aspects of the topic. There is evidence of originality and independent thought. • Fluent communication of information. Superior academic writing skills. Minimal errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. • A clear understanding of the core subject area and sound knowledge of the chosen topic is communicated to the reader. • Academic writing is fluent and relevant, clear and/or cohesive. • There is basic adequate knowledge of the topic under investigation. • Evidence of academic writing noted but has minor errors in spelling, grammar and style. Not always relevant, clear and/or concise. • There is limited knowledge of the topic. • Elementary style of writing. Basic use of language. Multiple errors.

Return Date to Students 15 working days after assessment due date Length 2,500 words Weighting 25% Assessment Criteria Your assignment will be evaluated using an assessment rubric Referencing Style APA A summary of the APA system can be accessed in the online guide on the Library website at: http://uow.libguides.com/refcite/apa6