Reference no: EM133928359 , Length: Word Count:1600 words

Counselling Placement and Development

Case Study 1

Maria, a caseworker in a family support service, finds herself increasingly relying on her supervisor, Ben, not just for professional guidance but also for emotional support regarding her personal life. While Maria feels comfortable opening up, Ben is starting to worry that professional boundaries are becoming blurred. At the same time, Maria struggles when feedback is given in a more formal, structured way, as she has come to expect a more personal style of supervision. This tension is beginning to affect the effectiveness of their supervisory relationship.

Case Study 2

Ahmed, a senior practitioner with a reputation for being highly skilled, attends supervision sessions but treats them as a formality. He prefers practical discussions about caseloads and tasks, showing little interest in reflective practice. When encouraged to explore how his personal values and responses influence his work with clients, Ahmed dismisses this as "too theoretical" and insists that his experience speaks for itself. His resistance creates ongoing tension with his supervisor Ethan, who wants to support Ahmed's professional development through reflective supervision.

Case Study 3

Tara, a community youth worker, recently experienced a hostile confrontation with a teenage client who became verbally aggressive during a session. Although the situation did not escalate physically, Tara left the encounter shaken and unsure whether she had handled it appropriately. She feels nervous about meeting the client again and worries about her safety. The organisation encourages staff to request debriefing after such incidents, but Tara is hesitant to do so, fearing it might reflect poorly on her competence. During supervision, Tara struggles to decide whether to raise the incident or simply "move on."

Case Study 4

Rubina, a recently promoted team leader in a disability support organisation, now supervises staff who were previously her peers. While she is confident in her technical skills, she feels uncertain about her new responsibilities in supervision. One of the workers Hannah expect her to act as a friend and confidante, while others look to her for clear direction and formal feedback. Rubina feels caught between maintaining positive relationships and fulfilling her supervisory role. She worries that if she sets firm expectations, she might damage trust with colleagues. This lack of clarity has left Rubina feeling stressed and unsure of how to manage supervision effectively. Get expert online assignment help in the USA.

ASSESSMENT: WRITTEN ASSESSMENT

Students are required to demonstrate their understanding of both supervision models (Morton-Cooper & Palmer and Kadushin) by applying relevant theory from these models to one of the four provided case studies. This assignment requires students to critically analyse the case study, justify how theory from each model can address the issues presented, and provide practical applications of the models in supervision.

Students must analyse the case study from both perspectives:

As a supervisor: Describe how you would apply relevant theory from each supervision model to address the issues presented in the case. Outline practical strategies and steps you would take, drawing on the relevant principles of both models.

As the worker: Reflect on how relevant theory from each supervision model would impact you if you were in the worker's position. Discuss how the approaches could support your professional growth and address the challenges you face.

Assessment Guidelines

1. Structure:

Include a Cover Sheet, title, table of content, introduction, body, conclusion and reference list.

Clearly identify and explain key aspects of both supervision models as they relate to the chosen case study.

Use headings and subheadings to organise your work for clarity.

2. Content:

Analyse the case study from both perspectives (supervisor and worker).

Provide a well-balanced discussion that integrates theory and practice.

3. Formatting:

Use standard English (not American) spelling.

Ensure proper use of academic language and structure.

Submit your work as a Word document.

4. References:

Include a minimum of 10 academic references.

Use APA 7 referencing style for in-text citations and the reference list.

5. Additional Expectations:

Demonstrate critical thinking and an understanding of the supervision models.

Link your analysis to the context of the case study, addressing specific challenges and proposing practical solutions.

Proofread your work for grammar, spelling, and formatting errors before submission.

Bulleted points are not permitted (unless outlined in the assessment task), please write in full sentences/paragraphs.

Follow academic integrity principles. Do not use AI tools or other external assistance to generate content for the assignment.

You must use the current APA referencing. Your report should include reference to the weekly readings and at least 10 (scholarly) journal articles read, in addition to any textbook references.