Reference no: EM133861311

Assignment

Describe how to evaluate the program found in the case study. You will also determine the methodology for this program evaluation and indicate other details such as associated research questions, definitions of variables, sampling and data collection procedures, applicable instruments, and discussion of ethical issues pertaining to human subjects.

I. Introduction: State the topics that will be covered in this section.

II. Organization description: Describe the program or service (program focus, resources, population, clients served, and the theory of change). Include a description of the stakeholders and evaluation purpose.

III. Research questions and hypotheses: Revisit research questions and hypotheses established in the Week 3 assignment, Research Literature Review.

IV. Definition of variables and terms in the study: Define your major variables in a clear and concise manner, and distinguish between independent and dependent variables. Every variable that is identified in the research questions should be defined clearly in this section in terms of what it is and how it will be measured.

V. Description of the methodology (study design).

i. Explain whether your study is qualitative, quantitative, or both and whether it is cross-sectional (single point in time) or longitudinal (more than one measure from the same people).

ii. Explain how you are going to determine the efficacy of your program (for example, pre-tests and post-tests, comparison to a similar group of people not receiving program services).

iii. Explain if you are comparing the group getting the intervention to any other group on the outcomes of interest (a control or comparison group).

iv. Explain if you are using more than one source of data to triangulate measures of your outcome of interest (for example, rates of participation, qualitative interviews, and a satisfaction survey).

v. Explain why this method of program evaluation and methodology is best practice (as compared to other possible models).

VI. Sampling procedures.

i. Distinguish between the population and your sample.

ii. Provide some basic demographic information that you would anticipate.

iii. State how many people are taking part in the study and how you will go about sampling them.

iv. Explain how the control/comparison group will be selected or how people are assigned to that group, if you are using a control/comparison group.

VII. Instrumentation: Do you plan to use a standardized instrument or will you design your own? Why? Every variable that is addressed in your research questions and operational definitions should also be addressed in this section. Describe the validity and reliability of your instruments. Note that you must include at least one quantitative measure. Include your instruments, including any qualitative interview protocols, in an appendix. Get the instant assignment help.

VIII. Data collection and procedures: Describe exactly what you plan to do and when. Explain how and when you will collect each measure, and how and when you will begin the intervention and for how long.

IX. Human protection: Discuss ethical issues pertaining to the method of program evaluation you selected. Discuss how you will address and minimize these issues. Include a sample informed consent (and minor assent, if necessary) as an appendix.

Case study:

Teen Parenting Case Study Your agency is providing eight-week parenting classes for teen parents in an urban environment. Services are open to both teen mothers and teen fathers, and their children can be any age. You get referrals from local schools, hospitals, social service agencies, and the Department of Children and Family Services. The interventions of the program include a weekly parenting class, dealing with topics such as child development, effective communication with children, stress management, and compassionate behavior management strategies. The anticipated outcomes of the program include: i. Increased knowledge about child development. ii. Increased sense of competence in parenting. iii. Decreased reported stress levels. iv. Beliefs in line with compassionate behavior management strategies rather than using corporal punishment.