Academic Writing Weighting: 10% Your introduction positions the reader with a clear and explicit understanding of the chosen case and the purpose of the essay. The body is well focused to the topic with a logical flow between paragraphs. The conclusion is decisive and relates clearly and specifically to the essay demonstrating convincing arguments for the decisions regarding priority problems and interventions. Adhered to writing/formatting Your introduction concisely and clearly introduces the chosen case and the purpose of the essay. The body addresses the task and flows well between and within the paragraphs. The conclusion is decisive and justified from the body and the topic of the paper. Adhered to writing/formatting guidelines with high quality Used appropriate professional language

Critical thinking, arguing and supporting with evidence in the context of the chosen scenario, priority problems/ interventions Weighting: 30% Provided a highly convincing, comprehensive justification for proposed interventions. Critically applies a depth of clinical knowledge, of two interventions to manage the chosen priority problem. Provides a compelling, consistent and highly accurate argument supporting the relevance and appropriateness of the two nursing interventions. For the most part, provided a convincing and comprehensive ju s t if ic a t i o n for proposed interventions. Applied a comprehensive clinical knowledge, of two interventions to manage the chosen priority problem. For the most part consistently and accurately argues the relevance and appropriateness of the two nursing interventions. For the most part, applies clinical

Critical thinking, arguing and supporting with evidence in the context of the chosen scenario, priority problems/ interventions Weighting: 30% Provided a highly convincing, comprehensive justification for proposed interventions. For the most part, provided a convincing and comprehensive ju s t if ic a t i o n for proposed interventions. Critically applies a depth of clinical knowledge, of two interventions to manage the chosen priority problem. Applied a comprehensive clinical knowledge, of two interventions to manage the chosen priority problem. Provides a compelling, consistent and highly accurate argument supporting the relevance and appropriateness of the two nursing interventions. For the most part consistently and accurately argues the relevance and appropriateness of the two nursing interventions. Applies in-depth clinical knowledge to accurately identify evaluation criteria to indicate the success of both nursing interventions. For the most part, applies clinical knowledge to accurately identify evaluation criteria to indicate the success of both nursing interventions.

Criteria 7 6 Demonstrates an understanding of the chosen scenario priority problem, linking to the scenario assessment data, pathophysiology/ interventions and evaluation of the interventions to address the problem Weighting: 15% Provided an in-depth and comprehensive ex pl an at i o n of all the significant assessment data from the scenario and applies clinical knowledge which unequivocally links to the identified priority problem. Pathophysiology comprehensively discussed. For the most part, provided a comprehensive explanation of the most significant assessment data from the scenario and applies clinical knowledge which strongly links to the identified priority problem. Pathophysiology broadly discussed with some minor gaps/omissions.

Be written in APA style and prepared as follows: • Have a cover sheet with the assessment title, your name, student number, tutor name and word count. Coversheet template is recommended. • Include a ‘footer’ on each page with your name, student number, unit code and page number. • 3 cm margins on all sides, double-spaced text • Times new roman, font size 12 • APA style referencing