Please wait... I replied back on the mail. kindly check that. Please proceed on ‘Thales’ Please add process map (where may require), also probably a diagram or any presentation features to make it look highly presentable. I refer to my initial mail on IT assessments on which I have attached couple of pdf files. Please check with your experts if those file are fine for the write-up and also their reference has been captured on the write-up. my request is: "Assessment contains two part interim for (P&G attached)1500 words and final 4500 words which includes interim word count as well". For exclusive P&G I requested for 1500 words, but in assessment i could see approximate of 500 words... Can you please re-confirm both points. Request is for 1500 P&G + 3000 assessment write up = 4500 PG will be part of the complete write up. Thank you for the help. I have now finished my class. I will call you back soon with my new sem. thanks once again.

Critical evaluation of possible improvements to the organisation’s use of information systems; focus on same three key areas as above? 15% Critical analysis of the importance of security in information management in the chosen organisation; risk landscape assessment; recommendations? 15% Referencing and presentation 15% Overall Comments Total 100%

Criteria Max Mark Achievable Quality of literature review – evidence of independent research, critical engagement with sources, a discussion of the differences between opposing or complementary views; clear understanding of IG and IS? 20% Demonstration of understanding of information governance in practice; clear argument showing which elements are present in the case study? 15% Solid analysis of the chosen organisation's/department's information systems; focus on staff development, communication flow, decision making? 20%

Referencing and presentation (20%) Excellent Harvard referencing throughout the paper and an excellent bibliography/references list. The paper itself is presented in a clear, logical way, and would be appropriate for peer-review publication. Very minor Harvard referencing errors throughout the paper and bibliography. The paper itself is presented with some style

Critical analysis of the importance of security in information management (20%) An excellent discussion of the risk landscape around information management in general and in the chosen organisation; types of risks (internal, external, malicious, unintended, natural disasters) and possible impact (operation, legal, financial) and mitigation. Fully supported by existing literature and great evidence of a logically developed conceptual framework. A good discussion of the risk landscape around information management, which covers most aspects. Stronger support from existing literature may have been needed.

Critical evaluation of possible improvements to the organisation’s use of information systems (20%) An excellent proposal for possible improvements to the organisation’s use of IMS, in terms of infrastructure, use of the cloud, use of data, use of social media (internally and externally), with a focus on staff development, communication, decision making. All aspects fully discussed and properly supported by relevant theoretical frameworks and the previous analysis. A good proposal for possible improvements to the organisation’s use of IMS, with few areas that needed more attention and stronger support from the previous analysis or existing literature

Critical appraisal of the use of information systems in an organisation (20%) An excellent analysis of inner-facing and outer-facing social media; of corporate infrastructure, including cloud services in use, their type, advantages and disadvantages for the organisation; operations management; data collection and use for adding added value to the organisation’s operations are all considered to a high level of excellence. The organisation’s particular context is taken into account in each and every aspect. A good analysis of a chosen organisation, that discusses some of the most obvious aspects of the use of information systems, with good consideration for the organisation’s context

Criteria and Weighting To obtain 70% or above: To obtain 60% or above: Critically reflect on the senior manager's role and responsibility in leading information governance within a service or organisation (20%) An excellent reflection, very well written, making full use of the information in the case study as well as relevant literature. Use of theoretical frameworks (such as “five rights”, CIA, etc.) to support the analysis of the roles and responsibilities of senior leadership. Technical issues, cultural issues, security and legal implications of data location, the importance of the “one truth” for decision making are all considered, and more. Coherent and fully justified conclusions. A good reflection, well written, making good use of the information in the case study as well as relevant literature for the topic, but more integration of theoretical frameworks in practice would be needed.

- High skilled academic writing (appropriate one) - Cover page (an example is available to you in Induction/Unit 4) - Abstract (no more than 150 words in a single paragraph) - Table of contents (Table of tables/figures if necessary) - A subsection for each of the five questions of the assessment - no more than 4500 words in total - References (or Bibliography) – at Master level you must use in-text citations to support your arguments and any work cited must appear in the References list at the end of the work. - Conclusion with critical analysis Organization can be choose either IT Security company / IT Cyber-security, existing real on or let me know if you have better ideas. Please send me the quotation & also provide me reply on Organization that your proposing for this assessment. Kindly ensure to take extra care on all my assessments.

The assessment contains two part interim for (P&G attached)1500 words and final 4500 words which includes interim word-count as well Interim 1500 + final 3000 = includes 4500/-, this is inter-connected. please give clarity on the below points before we start on assignment: 1. The organization can choose either IT Security company / IT Cyber-security, existing real on or let me know if you have better ideas. 2. Can you also acknowledge the pdf n word documents. Are you clear on the requirements? Subject: IT Assessment Please find attached new IT assessment ensure to follow those instructions in the word file and also the below mentioned: - Assessment contains two part interim for (P&G attached)1500 words and final 4500 words which includes interim wordcount as well - kindly ensure to included attached documents referencing & along with external research for Harvard referencing