Reference no: EM133539203

Question

P collects vintage musical instruments. P recently purchased a rare violin at an auction in New Jersey for $6 million. He needed to have the violin shipped to their home in New York and it needed to be kept in a temperature controlled environment. P higher dante's movers a company owned and operated by peace friend. New paragraph dante picked up the violin from the auction house and transported to peace house Dante used the box truck with temperature controlled storage area P inspected the violated the auction house just prior to Dante picking it up to ensure it was in good condition. Upon arrival at Pete's house pier then check the violin and notice at being warped from heat during delivery. Pee and Dante went into the back of dante's truck and discovered that a temperature control unit malfunctioned during delivery new paragraph P had a violent expert come to assess the damage. The experts stated that the violin was a copy. The experts stated that the violin was a copy it was never worth the six million Pete initially paid. The experts stated that it was a very good copy and without the damage it would be worth around $20,000. With the damage it was worth about $2000 period piece sued the auction house for the amount they paid for the violin over its value and Dante for the damage to it. New paragraph piece suit in federal court in the Eastern District of New York P lives in the in that district and the violin was delivered to peace home in that district. The auction house is a corporation with the state of incorporation and principal place of business in New Jersey. Dante also lives in New Jersey. The claim against Dante simply states quote dante's negligence caused $18,000 in damages to the violin when transporting it unquote.new paragraph P harder process service to serve the complaint and summons. The process server delivered the complaint and summons of the auction houses registered agent the process server went to dante's place of business to serve Dante and discovered that Dante was staying at a lake house that they own and stayed at frequently during certain times of the year. The process server went to the lake house and dante's adult sister opened the door. The sister said that she was staying at the house with Dante and Dante and family were currently out on a boat and would not come back for a few hours. The process server attempted to hand assisted the complainant summons but the sister refused to accept it telling the process server to return later when Dante was home and shut the door the process server instead sit the complaint and summons under the door Dante received the complaint and summons with Dante retention lake that's a substantive father prancer motion dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and venue and proper service and failure to state a claim Dante also moved to implicate climate control products the company that made and sold the temperature control unit in the truck that failed during delivery. Climate control products is located in New York they filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction how should the court rule on all the previous motions?