Reference no: EM133752482
Contrasting Developmental Theories
Developmental theories are being revisited in Unit 9. Thus far, you have learned about a number of theories, including how these theories help us understand physical, cognitive, and social-emotional changes from birth through adolescence. Theories you have considered this term include Piaget's cognitive-developmental theory, Vygotsky's sociocultural theory, Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory, Erikson's psychosocial theory, dynamic systems theory, and Bowlby's ethological theory of attachment, to name a few. However, no single developmental theory has yet explained all of the complexities of development. In this assignment, you will continue exploring the topic of developmental theories by completing a contrast of two theories of your choice and thinking critically about what an ideal developmental theory would look like.
The theories will be contrasted on the following points:
Main characteristics of theory.
Domain of focus (physical, cognitive, social-emotional, or a combination of several domains)
Considers development to be continuous, discontinuous, or both.
Stance on influence of genetics and/or the environment
Example of theory concept applied to child development.
Two strengths of theory
Two weaknesses of theory
Does the theory fully explain physical, cognitive, and social-emotional changes from infancy through adolescence? (Yes/No and briefly explain your answer)
Following the theories contrast, please answer the following critical thinking questions on the ideal developmental theory:
If you could design the ideal developmental theory to explain development from infancy through adolescence, either by combining existing developmental theories or by creating a new, all-encompassing developmental theory, what would your theory look like? In describing your ideal developmental theory, consider the domain/s of focus, the continuity and/or discontinuity of development, the role of genetics, environment, culture, and personal experiences in shaping individuals.
What are the potential benefits of such a comprehensive developmental theory?
What are the potential challenges of such a comprehensive developmental theory?