Genre, Grammar, Spelling & Word Limit Complete essay components/structure evident. No spelling errors. Adheres to correct word limit Most essay components/structure evident. Minimal spelling and or grammatical errors (1 – 2 errors). Mainly adheres to correct word limit. Some essay components/structure evident. Moderate spelling errors and grammatical errors (3 to 5). Moderately over or under word limit (11- 20%) No essay components/structure evident. Numerous spelling errors and or grammar errors (6 or more). Considerably under or over the word limit (21% or more). Marks 0 0.5 1 1.5 Evidence of research, correct APA style referencing. No referencing style errors (in-text and reference list). Highly relevant research (6 or more). Minor referencing errors ( 1 - 2 errors: in-text referencing and reference list) Satisfactory (3) to moderate (5) investigation via use of relevant and adequate research.

Marks 4.0 -3.6 3.5 - 3.1 3.0 - 2.6 2.5 - 2.0 1.9 - 0 Conclusion Excellent synthesis of information from assignment that clearly ties highly relevant main points together. Well-structured, concise reflection on importance of findings. Quality synthesis of information from assignment that clearly ties relevant main points together. Well-structured, concise reflection on importance of findings. Above average synthesis of information from assignment clearly ties main points together. Concise reflection demonstrates importance of findings. Demonstration of synthesis from assignment evident with some points from assignment discussed. Importance of findings indicated. Inappropriate or absent conclusion. Conclusion includes new material. Referenced material in conclusion.

Marks 8.0 - 7.1 7.0 - 6.1 6.0 - 5.1 5.0 - 4.0 3.9 - 0 Conclusions drawn Highly relevant, clear and concise discussion on one (1) or more highly relevant positive and one (1) or more highly relevant negative indicatorfor implementing the health e-record for this patient care experience. Relevant, clear discussion on one (1) or more relevant positive and one (1) or more relevant negative indicatorfor implementing the health e-record for this patient care experience. Above average discussion on one (1) relevant positive and one (1) relevant negative indicatorfor implementing the health e-record for this patient care experience. Sound discussion on one (1) positive and one (1) negative indicator for implementing the health e-record for this patient care experience. Limited or vague discussion on positive and negative indicators for implementing the health e-record for this patient care experience.

Marks 4.0 - 3.6 3.5 - 3.1 3.0 - 2.6 Analysis Highly relevant, clear and comprehensive analysis of the event and the health e-record for this patient care experience. Highly relevant, strong justification for the health e-record for this patient care experience. Highly relevant, strong, clear and accurate discussion of links between the health e-record and specific, relevant nursing governances. Relevant, clear and comprehensive analysis of the event and the health e-record for this patient care experience. Relevant, strong justification for the health e-record. Relevant, strong, accurate discussion of links between the health e-record and specific, relevant nursing governances. Above average analysis of the event and the health e-record for this patient care experience. Above average justification for the health e-record for this patient care experience. Above average discussion of relevant links between the health e-record and specific, relevant nursing governances.

Marks 4.0 - 3.6 3.5 - 3.1 3.0 - 2.6 2.5 - 2.0 1.9 - 0 Values/Beliefs Highly relevant, logical clear and concise explanation on the values/beliefs that underpin their feelings – includes at least one (1) value/belief linked to personal feelings and one (1) value/belief accurately linked to relevant nursing governances. Clear integration of highly relevant resources to support discussion on values/beliefs. More than 2 highly relevant resources used. Relevant, logical and clear explanation on the values/beliefs that underpin their feelings– includes at least one (1) value/belieflinked to personal feelings and one (1) value/beliefaccurately linked to relevant nursing governances. Integrates of relevant resources to support discussion on values/beliefs. More than 2 highly relevant resources used. Clear, above average explanation of the values/beliefs that underpin their feelings– includes one (1) value/belieflinked to personal feelings and one (1) value/belief linked to nursing governances.

Marks 1.5 1.25 1.0 0.75 0.5 - 0 REFLECTIVE CYCLE Description Highly relevant, well-structured, clear and concise description of two (2) or more highly relevant themes of nursing care. Highly relevant, specific and clear justification for focusing on each area of care. Relevant well-structured, clear and concise description of two (2) or more relevant themes of nursing care. Relevant, specific and clear justification for focusing on each area of care. Above average concise description of two (2) relevant themes of nursing care. Above average clear justification for focusing on each area of care. Sound description of two (2) themes of nursing care. Sound justification for focusing on each area of care. Limited relevance. Absent, vague or limited description of themes of nursing care. Themes not relevant. Did not discuss two (2) themes. Justification absent, vague or inappropriate. Marks 3.0 - 2.7 2.6 - 2.3 2.2 - 1.9 1.8 - 1.5 1.4 - 0 Feelings Highly relevant and concise examination of their feelings as a nurse in relation to the patient care experience

Part A: 4 screen shots of online seeded forum posts (details provided p.4) Part B: Reflection word count: 600 words (+/- 10%)(details provided p.5 & 6) Marking Rubric • Assessment two will be marked against the marking rubrics – PART A(pages 6-9); PART B (pages 10-13) • NB. Academic writing and referencing may be subject to deductions based on accuracy and quality Screen Shots PART B - Reflection - Marking Rubric: 30 marks Outstanding Quality Above Average Sound Below Expectations ESSAY Introduction Introduction contains a highly relevant thesis statement. The introduction articulates well into the assignment and gives a clear indication of assignment content. Introduction contains a relevant thesis statement. The introduction articulates into the assignment and gives a clear indication of assignment content. Introduction contains a thesis statement. The introduction articulates into the assignment and gives some indication of assignment content. Does not contain a thesis statement. Intro states "the paper will cover… then it will cover…" Poor or absent introduction – does not set paper up well. Irrelevant information included in introduction.