Reference no: EM131737567
Assignment
Guidelines for Peer Review of the Capstone Project Paper Draft
As assigned, exchange your Capstone Project Paper draft with your assigned peer. The purpose of the assignment is for you to analyze the scholarly content of a peer's Capstone Project Paper. In this assignment, make extensive comments directly on the peer-review draft paper (from title page to reference page). Evaluate scholarly discourse, including theme development, appropriateness of content, transitions, clarity, and grammar, according to the assignment criteria. Comments should be presented in an encouraging and professional manner.
Use these questions as a guide when making comments on the assigned peer's paper critique.
1. Does the writer make the barrier or issue clear in the introduction?
2. Does the writer's course of action for addressing the barrier or issue follow the Logic Model?
3. Does the writer meet the criteria for each section as presented in the assignment?
4. Does the writer use professional health care terminology appropriately and correctly?
5. Does the paper flow smoothly? Does the paper follow a clear organizational pattern? Do the body paragraphs occur in a logical order? If not, suggest which paragraphs should be moved, where they should be placed, and why.
6. Does the writer give enough information from the research and supporting articles to clearly support the change project for a nursing intervention?
7. Do you notice any errors in grammar, mechanics, punctuation, or APA formatting?
8. What advice can you give this writer for each section of the paper and to improve the draft overall (suggestions for improvement, outside resources/sources)?
Your feedback will help your fellow student identify possible strengths, weaknesses, and basic errors. Be thorough, keeping in mind that the suggestions you provide will help your classmate make the changes necessary to complete a more successful paper.
Attachment:- Capstone-Project-Jennifer-Massey.rar
|
Comparing and contrasting the economic viewpoints
: In five hundred words by comparing and contrasting the economic viewpoints and theories of John Maynard Keynes and Friedrich Hayek.
|
|
Electronic health records in the future
: Do you think genetic profiles will become a standard part of the electronic health records in the future? Justify your answer and be specific.
|
|
Management and the union favor no-strike
: Generally why do both management and the union favor no-strike, no-lockout provisions? Discuss commonly used methods for peacefully
|
|
Why was an undervalued currency good for germany
: Shortly after World War II, the US occupying forces set the value of the Dmark and the yen below equilibrium values in Germany and Japan.
|
|
Analyze the scholarly content of a peers capstone project
: The purpose of the assignment is for you to analyze the scholarly content of a peer's Capstone Project Paper.
|
|
What factors would determine firm in the us
: According to the BLS, wage rates in Mexico are only about 10% of those in the US. What factors would determine whether your firm should shut down its plants.
|
|
Basic understanding of different political
: This tour includes attaining a basic understanding of different political, economic, cultural, social, legal, administrative systems.
|
|
Define the level of a certain contamination
: In the decision for evil-not wholly, but perhaps at the level of a certain contamination of which he is not sufficiently mindful
|
|
Process involved in formulating a business problem
: Conduct credible academic research and in a five-hundred word essay, explain the role of critical thinking in business.
|