Reference no: EM134005399

Think of a team you're currently on (or have been on recently). This could be:

A work team or project team
A cross-functional team
A committee or task force
Even a volunteer or community team
Address the following:

Describe your team briefly (2-3 sentences):
What is the team's purpose?
How many people are on it?
How long has it existed?
Assess psychological safety (using Edmondson article):
On a scale of 1-10, how psychologically safe is this team? No AI shortcuts — Get authentic assignment help from qualified, real tutors.
What evidence supports your rating? (Give at least two specific examples of behaviors that indicate high or low safety)
Can people speak up, disagree, or admit mistakes without fear?
Analyze team norms and climate (using Mitchell & Gamlem Chapter 3 and Runde & Flanagan Chapter 5):
Does your team have explicit norms? If so, what are they? If not, what implicit norms have developed?
Does your team have the "right climate" for constructive conflict? (Trust norms? Constructive communication practices?)
What's working well? What's missing?
Identify a problem (using Mitchell & Gamlem Chapter 10):
Have you witnessed any behavior on the "spectrum of disrespect" (micro-inequities, discrimination, harassment, bullying)?
How did this behavior affect team dynamics and psychological safety?
Was it addressed? If so, how? If not, why not?
Propose ONE specific intervention:
What is ONE concrete action your team could take to increase psychological safety or improve team conflict competence?
Reference at least ONE reading (Mitchell & Gamlem, Runde & Flanagan, OR Edmondson)
Be specific: What would happen? Who would do it? When?
For Your Peer Responses (100-150 words each to 2 classmates):
Compare psychological safety levels: How does your team's safety level compare to your classmate's? What factors might explain the difference?
Suggest an additional intervention from the readings that could help their team
Ask a probing question about their team's norms, climate, or the disrespectful behavior they described
Avoid generic responses like "Great post!" or "I agree."