Correct citation of key resources and evidence Percentage for this criterion 10% Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed. Demonstrates use of high quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. Demonstrates use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within the organisation for sourcing evidence Demonstrates use of high-quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within and without the organisation for sourcing evidence

Effective Communication Well-structured report with a clear line of reasoning Percentage for this criterion 20% Expertly presented; the presentation is logical, persuasive, and well supported by evidence, demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments.Engages and sustains audience’s interest in the topic, demonstrates high levels of insight and analytical skills.

Analysis and application with synthesis of new knowledge Demonstrates a clear understanding of the practical applications and implications of relevant concepts Percentage for this criterion 30% Highly sophisticated and creative analysis, synthesis of new with existing knowledge. Strong application by way of pretested models and/or independently developed models. Recommendations are clearly justified based on the analysis/synthesis. Applying knowledge to new situations/other cases.

Contribution to the discussion forum Percentage for this criterion 10% Entries show insight, depth and understanding. The content of posts is connected with events, topic or activity, and are supported by evidence and examples. Entries are relevant with links to supporting material.

Assessment Attributes Knowledge and understanding Understands theory and concepts Percentage for this criterion 30% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% A sophisticated understanding of the theory. Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Mastery of concepts and application to new situations/further learning.

Submit your Assessment 2 Internal and External Stakeholder Analysis in the submission link in the main navigation menu in MGT501 Business Environment by the end of Module 5.2 (week 10). A rubric will be attached to the assessment. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. Marking Rubric: Your reports will be marked against the rubric, which is shown on the next pages. Please ensure that your submission addresses all five of the Assessment Attributes in the rubric.

Submission By 11:59pm AEST/AEDT Friday of Module 5.2 (week 10) Weighting 50% Your individual stakeholder analysis should follow standard report structure and include the following: • Cover page • Executive Summary o A concise summary of the main report in bullet points • Introduction and background information on your business example • Main body o Identify functional areas o Identify internal and external stakeholders and their roles o Identify the nature and degree of main stakeholders’ interests, and implications of conflicting interests o Identify the level of main stakeholders’ influence o Create a stakeholder matrix o In the discussion forum, choose an example from your peers and compare the industry your business operates in with their industry, identify the main points of stakeholder dissimilarities and analyse the differences in stakeholder interests and influences • Conclusion • References • Appendices (if necessary)