The games economists play, Managerial Accounting

THE GAMES ECONOMISTS PLAY

It sounds like a sports fan's dream.  In Stockholm on October 11th, three men share a $1m prize for their skill at analyzing games. They are not television pundits, or armchair critics of Manchester United or the Miami Dolphins, though economists. Two Americans, John Harsanyi and John Nash, and a German, Reinhard Selten, have won 1994 Nobel Prize for economics for their studies of "game theory".

Game theory may sound trivial.  It is not.  In the past 20 years or so it has revolutionized the economics of industrial organization and has influenced many other branches of the subject, notably the theories of monetary policy and international trade. These days, no economics student can expect to graduate without knowing the basics of it.

Odd though it may seem, until game theory came along most economists assumed that firms could ignore the effects of their behavior on the actions of others. That is fine whenever markets are perfectly competitive: what one firm or consumer does can make no difference to the total picture.  Fine, too, when unchallenged monopolists hold sway: they have no opponents to worry about.

Though in many examples this assumption is wrong. Most of the industries are dominated by a few firms: by building a new plant or cutting prices (or threatening to cut them), a firm can affect how its rivals behave.  And it is not just in industrial economics which such evaluations matter. Some countries may impose (or threaten) trade sanctions against others in an attempt to prize open protected markets. A government may put up short-term rates when inflation is low to convince financial markets that it is serious about fighting inflation; with luck, the markets will then require lower long-term interest rates.

These illustrations are, in a way, just like games: no football coach plans an attack without taking into account the defenders' likely response. Modern game theory was fathered by Johm von Neumann, a mathematician, and Oskar Morgenstern, an economist, who published "Theory of Games and Economic Behavior" in 1944 (an anniversary which was not lost on 1994 Nobel-prize givers). Messrs Harsanyi, Nash and Selten have honed it into the sharp tool economists use today.

In the early 1950's Mr. Nash produced a compelling way of working out how games will end up when players cannot commit themselves, or do not want to collude with each other. A "Nash equilibrium" occurs when no player wants to change his strategy, given full knowledge of other players' strategies.

Posted Date: 12/8/2012 2:49:17 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- The games economists play, Assignment Help, Ask Question on The games economists play, Get Answer, Expert's Help, The games economists play Discussions

Write discussion on The games economists play
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Battle of the Sexes game To understand Battle of the Sexes game, let’s consider a story as follows: Two players (a couple) wish to go to an event together but disagree about

given the above data what would the breakeven in units and dollars be if u wanted a necessary after tax profit of $ 36,000 (assume a 30% tax rate ) units __________ ales dollars _

why the activity costing have most comparative bid?

Major features of JIT (1) Elimination of non-value added activity:   JIT manufacturing can be described as a philosophy of management, dedicate to the elimination of waste. Wa

Disadvantages of participatory budgets   They consume more time and therefore are more expensive The advantage of management participation may be negated by failure t

Model Construction The success of a simulation exercise is related to the predictive quality of the underlying model, so that considerable care should be taken with model const


Various stages of product life cycle Typically the life cycle of a manufactured product will consist of the following stages: 1) market research : before any investment in

You are charged with describing the important considerations in the decision-making process to upper management. In your response, be sure to include the following: • A descript

Planning A business must plan for its success. What do we understand by business planning? It is about thinking in advance -- to decide on a course of the action to reach