Take an action in court, Business Law and Ethics

A is a Malaysian contractor in the oil and gas business. B is a large British oil exploration company. By a written Contract, B appointed A in January 2008 to maintain B's offshore platform for a period of 3 years. The platform is just off the coast of Terengganu.

The contract between A and B states that, "Any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this contract, or the breach, termination or invalidity thereof, shall be decided by arbitration in accordance with the Rules for Arbitration of the Regional Centre for Arbitration Kuala Lumpur by three Arbitrators appointed in accordance with the rules. The place of Arbitration shall be Switzerland"

By letter dated 31.12.2009, B terminates the contract with A, stating that the termination was due to unsatisfactory work performed by A and that B has incurred various costs rectifying A's shoddy work.

A issued a Notice of Arbitration in January 2010 pursuant to the arbitration agreement in the Contract and claims for loss of profits as a result of the termination of the Contract. B however, has filed a claim in Court against A for breach of Contract and for damages related to the costs it says it suffered as a result of the shoddy work.

At the Preliminary meeting with the Tribunal, it was discovered that the Contract was in fact not signed by B although both parties performed their obligations under the terms stipulated under the written document (the Contract) from January 2009. On this ground, B challenges the Tribunal's jurisdiction to hear and determine the dispute on grounds that there is in fact no Contract (and therefore any arbitration agreement) between A and B.

            Based on the aforesaid facts, discuss the following:

(a) whether the Tribunal may determine if it has jurisdiction to hear and determine the disputes between the parties.

(b) if so, explain with reasons whether there is, in your view, an arbitration Agreement between A and B.

(c)  what, in your view, is the seat of the arbitration in this dispute

(d)  whether B may proceed with its action in Court.

Posted Date: 3/6/2013 1:19:23 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Take an action in court, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Take an action in court, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Take an action in court Discussions

Write discussion on Take an action in court
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Explain The criminal jurisdiction The criminal jurisdiction is exercised on the basis of the following: 1. Nationality 2. Territory 3. Universal jurisdiction and 4. Specifi

QUESTION 1 Outline the history of Labour Laws in Mauritius QUESTION 2 a) In what circumstances can an employer raise the defence of abandonment of work? b) Section 1

QUESTION (a) The new Guideline on Corporate Governance relates to the processes and structures that should be put in place in order to direct and manage the business and affair

Determine the expansionary monetary policy The possible spillover effects associated with expansionary monetary policy. In particular with fixed exchange rates expansionary mon

Assets and liabilities of the company: Within 14 days of the making of the order for winding up a statement of affairs must be delivered to the liquidator (Official Receiver)

State the royal assent for the procedure of parliamentary. The Royal Assent: It is specified when the Bill has passes by both Houses successfully and is usually simply fo

WHAT ARE MITIGATING FACTORS OF A CONTRACT

Mischief rule: "Four things are to be considered and discussed:; (i) First is 'what was the common law earlier than the making of the Act?' (ii) is 'what was the mischie

Question 1: (a) Explain what is meant by Subsidiary Legislation and the reasons for using such a law. (b) Describe the ways in which Subsidiary Legislation is controlled.

Hire-Purchase Law A person who wants to buy goods through does not have the like "money consideration" prescribed through the Sale of Goods Act like their price may enter in a