Take an action in court, Business Law and Ethics

A is a Malaysian contractor in the oil and gas business. B is a large British oil exploration company. By a written Contract, B appointed A in January 2008 to maintain B's offshore platform for a period of 3 years. The platform is just off the coast of Terengganu.

The contract between A and B states that, "Any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this contract, or the breach, termination or invalidity thereof, shall be decided by arbitration in accordance with the Rules for Arbitration of the Regional Centre for Arbitration Kuala Lumpur by three Arbitrators appointed in accordance with the rules. The place of Arbitration shall be Switzerland"

By letter dated 31.12.2009, B terminates the contract with A, stating that the termination was due to unsatisfactory work performed by A and that B has incurred various costs rectifying A's shoddy work.

A issued a Notice of Arbitration in January 2010 pursuant to the arbitration agreement in the Contract and claims for loss of profits as a result of the termination of the Contract. B however, has filed a claim in Court against A for breach of Contract and for damages related to the costs it says it suffered as a result of the shoddy work.

At the Preliminary meeting with the Tribunal, it was discovered that the Contract was in fact not signed by B although both parties performed their obligations under the terms stipulated under the written document (the Contract) from January 2009. On this ground, B challenges the Tribunal's jurisdiction to hear and determine the dispute on grounds that there is in fact no Contract (and therefore any arbitration agreement) between A and B.

            Based on the aforesaid facts, discuss the following:

(a) whether the Tribunal may determine if it has jurisdiction to hear and determine the disputes between the parties.

(b) if so, explain with reasons whether there is, in your view, an arbitration Agreement between A and B.

(c)  what, in your view, is the seat of the arbitration in this dispute

(d)  whether B may proceed with its action in Court.

Posted Date: 3/6/2013 1:19:23 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Take an action in court, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Take an action in court, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Take an action in court Discussions

Write discussion on Take an action in court
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Balance sheet: S.148(2) utilize the directors to prepare and lay before the company in simple meeting a balance sheet as at the date to such that the profit and loss account,

State the two alternatives of Policy Clustering That combines an element from each of these first two alternatives. One might think of it as a set of processes characterized by

QUESTION 1 (a) According to Thomas Dye "Public Policy is whatever governments choose to do or not to do". How far do you agree? (b) Explain clearly how the first important s

What is the meaning of Policy Convergence Under representative democracy - the number of voter with each preferred policy proposal can be illustrated by a frequency distributio

Question 1: Write brief notes on the following contractual terms:- (a) How an offer differ from an invitation to treat. (b) The principles governing goods wh

Differences Between Cheques And Other Bills of Exchange However the following are some of such the differences between like cheques and such other bills of exchange: like;

Acceptance - Element of Contract However this is the external manifestation about assent through the offeree.  Regarding to acceptance an agreement comes with existence between

Bagra Used Cars Ltd. has as the most prominent show on its lot an immaculate, highly polished model which rotates slowly on a raised circular platform under powerful floodlights. T

For the transactions provided below for the Braves Corporation during 2011, complete the following steps of the accounting cycle (round all answers and journal entries to the neare

Describe the policy making realities Rational models simply do not describe policy making realities. As policy actors seldom evaluate very many alternatives for action or compa