Synthesis theorem, Theory of Computation

Kleene called this the Synthesis theorem because his (and your) proof gives an effective procedure for synthesizing an automaton that recognizes the language denoted by any given regular expression.

1646_Synthesis theorem.png

The converse is known as the Analysis theorem. Our proof will involve a procedure that, given a DFA, constructs a regular expression denoting the language it recognizes.

Posted Date: 3/21/2013 1:22:15 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Synthesis theorem, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Synthesis theorem, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Synthesis theorem Discussions

Write discussion on Synthesis theorem
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
turing machine for prime numbers

Suppose A = (Σ, T) is an SL 2 automaton. Sketch an algorithm for recognizing L(A) by, in essence, implementing the automaton. Your algorithm should work with the particular automa

State & prove pumping lemma for regular set. Show that for the language L={ap |p is a prime} is not regular

Find the Regular Grammar for the following Regular Expression: a(a+b)*(ab*+ba*)b.

Given any NFA A, we will construct a regular expression denoting L(A) by means of an expression graph, a generalization of NFA transition graphs in which the edges are labeled with

1. Simulate a TM with infinite tape on both ends using a two-track TM with finite storage 2. Prove the following language is non-Turing recognizable using the diagnolization

Application of the general suffix substitution closure theorem is slightly more complicated than application of the specific k-local versions. In the specific versions, all we had

Computation of a DFA or NFA without ε-transitions An ID (q 1 ,w 1 ) computes (qn,wn) in A = (Q,Σ, T, q 0 , F) (in zero or more steps) if there is a sequence of IDs (q 1

It is not hard to see that ε-transitions do not add to the accepting power of the model. The underlying idea is that whenever an ID (q, σ  v) directly computes another (p, v) via

Let G be a graph with n > 2 vertices with (n2 - 3n + 4)/2 edges. Prove that G is connected.