Synthesis theorem, Theory of Computation

Kleene called this the Synthesis theorem because his (and your) proof gives an effective procedure for synthesizing an automaton that recognizes the language denoted by any given regular expression.

1646_Synthesis theorem.png

The converse is known as the Analysis theorem. Our proof will involve a procedure that, given a DFA, constructs a regular expression denoting the language it recognizes.

Posted Date: 3/21/2013 1:22:15 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Synthesis theorem, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Synthesis theorem, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Synthesis theorem Discussions

Write discussion on Synthesis theorem
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions

Intuitively, closure of SL 2 under intersection is reasonably easy to see, particularly if one considers the Myhill graphs of the automata. Any path through both graphs will be a

Theorem The class of recognizable languages is closed under Boolean operations. The construction of the proof of Lemma 3 gives us a DFA that keeps track of whether or not a give

The k-local Myhill graphs provide an easy means to generalize the suffix substitution closure property for the strictly k-local languages. Lemma (k-Local Suffix Substitution Clo

distinguish between histogram and historigram

The fundamental idea of strictly local languages is that they are speci?ed solely in terms of the blocks of consecutive symbols that occur in a word. We'll start by considering lan

Theorem (Myhill-Nerode) A language L ⊆ Σ is recognizable iff ≡L partitions Σ* into ?nitely many Nerode equivalence classes. Proof: For the "only if" direction (that every recogn

proof ogdens lemma .with example i am not able to undestand the meaning of distinguished position .

The computation of an SL 2 automaton A = ( Σ, T) on a string w is the maximal sequence of IDs in which each sequential pair of IDs is related by |- A and which starts with the in

Let L1 and L2 be CGF. We show that L1 ∩ L2 is CFG too. Let M1 be a decider for L1 and M2 be a decider for L2 . Consider a 2-tape TM M: "On input x: 1. copy x on the sec