Suffix substitution closure, Theory of Computation

Our primary concern is to obtain a clear characterization of which languages are recognizable by strictly local automata and which aren't. The view of SL2 automata as generators lets us do this by considering the characteristics of the tilings they build. Consider, for instance the situation in the top half of Figure 5, where there are two tilings u1σv1 and u2σv2 in which the symbol ‘σ' occurs. Clearly, after having built u1σ we had the choice of continuing with either v1 or with v2. We had the same choice after having built u2σ. Hence both of the tilings in the bottom half are constructable as well.

What this means for the strings, is that the question of whether we can extend a particular string to produce a longer string that is in the language depends only on the last symbol of that string.

Posted Date: 3/21/2013 6:09:41 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Suffix substitution closure, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Suffix substitution closure, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Suffix substitution closure Discussions

Write discussion on Suffix substitution closure
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Suppose A = (Q,Σ, T, q 0 , F) is a DFA and that Q = {q 0 , q 1 , . . . , q n-1 } includes n states. Thinking of the automaton in terms of its transition graph, a string x is recogn

Construct a Mealy machine that can output EVEN or ODD According to the total no. of 1''s encountered is even or odd.

Computations are deliberate for processing information. Computability theory was discovered in the 1930s, and extended in the 1950s and 1960s. Its basic ideas have become part of

Paths leading to regions B, C and E are paths which have not yet seen aa. Those leading to region B and E end in a, with those leading to E having seen ba and those leading to B no

This close relationship between the SL2 languages and the recognizable languages lets us use some of what we know about SL 2 to discover properties of the recognizable languages.

It is not hard to see that ε-transitions do not add to the accepting power of the model. The underlying idea is that whenever an ID (q, σ  v) directly computes another (p, v) via

Let L1 and L2 be CGF. We show that L1 ∩ L2 is CFG too. Let M1 be a decider for L1 and M2 be a decider for L2 . Consider a 2-tape TM M: "On input x: 1. copy x on the sec

State & prove pumping lemma for regular set. Show that for the language L={ap |p is a prime} is not regular

LTO was the closure of LT under concatenation and Boolean operations which turned out to be identical to SF, the closure of the ?nite languages under union, concatenation and compl

The Recognition Problem for a class of languages is the question of whether a given string is a member of a given language. An instance consists of a string and a (?nite) speci?cat