Suffix substitution closure, Theory of Computation

Our primary concern is to obtain a clear characterization of which languages are recognizable by strictly local automata and which aren't. The view of SL2 automata as generators lets us do this by considering the characteristics of the tilings they build. Consider, for instance the situation in the top half of Figure 5, where there are two tilings u1σv1 and u2σv2 in which the symbol ‘σ' occurs. Clearly, after having built u1σ we had the choice of continuing with either v1 or with v2. We had the same choice after having built u2σ. Hence both of the tilings in the bottom half are constructable as well.

What this means for the strings, is that the question of whether we can extend a particular string to produce a longer string that is in the language depends only on the last symbol of that string.

Posted Date: 3/21/2013 6:09:41 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Suffix substitution closure, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Suffix substitution closure, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Suffix substitution closure Discussions

Write discussion on Suffix substitution closure
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Since the signi?cance of the states represented by the nodes of these transition graphs is arbitrary, we will allow ourselves to use any ?nite set (such as {A,B,C,D,E, F,G,H} or ev

Automata and Compiler (1) [25 marks] Let N be the last two digits of your student number. Design a finite automaton that accepts the language of strings that end with the last f

Question 2 (10 pt): In this question we look at an extension to DFAs. A composable-reset DFA (CR-DFA) is a five-tuple, (Q,S,d,q0,F) where: – Q is the set of states, – S is the alph

shell script to print table in given range

One of the first issues to resolve, when exploring any mechanism for defining languages is the question of how to go about constructing instances of the mechanism which define part

Suppose A = (Q,Σ, T, q 0 , F) is a DFA and that Q = {q 0 , q 1 , . . . , q n-1 } includes n states. Thinking of the automaton in terms of its transition graph, a string x is recogn

Let ? ={0,1} design a Turing machine that accepts L={0^m 1^m 2^m } show using Id that a string from the language is accepted & if not rejected .

First model: Computer has a ?xed number of bits of storage. You will model this by limiting your program to a single ?xed-precision unsigned integer variable, e.g., a single one-by

how to understand DFA ?

We saw earlier that LT is not closed under concatenation. If we think in terms of the LT graphs, recognizing the concatenation of LT languages would seem to require knowing, while