Suffix substitution closure, Theory of Computation

Our primary concern is to obtain a clear characterization of which languages are recognizable by strictly local automata and which aren't. The view of SL2 automata as generators lets us do this by considering the characteristics of the tilings they build. Consider, for instance the situation in the top half of Figure 5, where there are two tilings u1σv1 and u2σv2 in which the symbol ‘σ' occurs. Clearly, after having built u1σ we had the choice of continuing with either v1 or with v2. We had the same choice after having built u2σ. Hence both of the tilings in the bottom half are constructable as well.

What this means for the strings, is that the question of whether we can extend a particular string to produce a longer string that is in the language depends only on the last symbol of that string.

Posted Date: 3/21/2013 6:09:41 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Suffix substitution closure, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Suffix substitution closure, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Suffix substitution closure Discussions

Write discussion on Suffix substitution closure
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions

construct a social network from the real-world data, perform some simple network analyses using Gephi, and interpret the results.

The initial ID of the automaton given in Figure 3, running on input ‘aabbba' is (A, aabbba) The ID after the ?rst three transitions of the computation is (F, bba) The p

In Exercise 9 you showed that the recognition problem and universal recognition problem for SL2 are decidable. We can use the structure of Myhill graphs to show that other problems

The language accepted by a NFA A = (Q,Σ, δ, q 0 , F) is NFAs correspond to a kind of parallelism in the automata. We can think of the same basic model of automaton: an inpu

Let there L1 and L2 . We show that L1 ∩ L2 is CFG . Let M1 be a decider for L1 and M2 be a decider for L2 . Consider a 2-tape TM M: "On input x: 1. copy x on the second

We can then specify any language in the class of languages by specifying a particular automaton in the class of automata. We do that by specifying values for the parameters of the

Exercise:  Give a construction that converts a strictly 2-local automaton for a language L into one that recognizes the language L r . Justify the correctness of your construction.

Different types of applications and numerous programming languages have been developed to make easy the task of writing programs. The assortment of programming languages shows, dif

Computer has a single unbounded precision counter which you can only increment, decrement and test for zero. (You may assume that it is initially zero or you may include an explici