Suffix substitution , Theory of Computation

Exercise Show, using Suffix Substitution Closure, that L3 . L3 ∈ SL2. Explain how it can be the case that L3 . L3 ∈ SL2, while L3 . L3 ⊆ L+3 and L+3 ∈ SL2. What happens to your counterexample to SSC?

Posted Date: 3/22/2013 1:06:38 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Suffix substitution , Assignment Help, Ask Question on Suffix substitution , Get Answer, Expert's Help, Suffix substitution Discussions

Write discussion on Suffix substitution
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
The path function δ : Q × Σ* → P(Q) is the extension of δ to strings: This just says that the path labeled ε from any given state q goes only to q itself (or rather never l


how to prove he extended transition function is derived from part 2 and 3

Given any NFA A, we will construct a regular expression denoting L(A) by means of an expression graph, a generalization of NFA transition graphs in which the edges are labeled with


Let L1 and L2 be CGF. We show that L1 ∩ L2 is CFG too. Let M1 be a decider for L1 and M2 be a decider for L2 . Consider a 2-tape TM M: "On input x: 1. copy x on the sec

Intuitively, closure of SL 2 under intersection is reasonably easy to see, particularly if one considers the Myhill graphs of the automata. Any path through both graphs will be a

When we study computability we are studying problems in an abstract sense. For example, addition is the problem of, having been given two numbers, returning a third number that is

Theorem (Myhill-Nerode) A language L ⊆ Σ is recognizable iff ≡L partitions Σ* into ?nitely many Nerode equivalence classes. Proof: For the "only if" direction (that every recogn

One of the first issues to resolve, when exploring any mechanism for defining languages is the question of how to go about constructing instances of the mechanism which define part