Rollback equilibrium, Game Theory

Rollback equilibrium

 

 

930_rollback equilibrium.jpg

 

(b) In the rollback equilibrium, A and B vote For while C and D vote Against; this leads to payoffs of (3, 4, 3, 4). The complete equilibrium strategies are A votes For, B always votes For, C votes For unless both A and B voted For in which case C votes Against, and D always votes Against.

(c) The rollback equilibrium in any situation like this, where only one vote needs to change to affect the outcome, will entail the last voter’s (of the group willing to change) being the one to change her vote. Observers seeing a player like B changing her vote could use this rollback equilibrium to show that if  B had not done so, C would have. This argument is similar to claiming that B did not use her equilibrium strategy, since there was a voter to follow who would have changed her vote if B had not done so.


(d) This argument builds on the analysts’ views of the payoff structure for the legislators. Those who had opposed the death penalty originally but switched before the preliminary vote could not afford to switch their votes a second time; such an action presumably would give the impression of indecision or lack of conviction which the electorate might find unappeal- ing. Legislators hoping to maintain their seats would not want to switch positions so often that their constituents could not identify their true beliefs

Posted Date: 9/27/2012 3:15:06 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Rollback equilibrium, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Rollback equilibrium, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Rollback equilibrium Discussions

Write discussion on Rollback equilibrium
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
A reserve worth is that the minimum acceptable bid in an auction. If no bidder submits a bid higher than the reserve worth, the auctioneer keeps the item offered for sale. Alternat

The following is a payoff matrix for a non-cooperative simultaneous move game between 2 players. The payoffs are in the order (Player 1; Player 2): What is/are the Nash Equil

A simultaneous game is one during which all players build choices (or choose a strategy) while not information of the methods that are being chosen by different players. Although t

GAME PLAYING IN CLASS There are several games that are appropriate for use on the first or second day of class. These games are simple but can be used to convey important poin

Identification is a problem of model formultion, rather than inf nlnde! estimation or appraisal. We say a model is identified if it is in a unique statistical form, enabling unique

One charm of evolutionary game theory is that it permits for relaxation of the normal fully-informed rational actor assumption. People, or agents, are assumed to be myopic, within

Case study GAME 1 Rock-Scissors-Paper This game entails playing three different versions of the children's game rock-scissors-paper. In rock-scissors-paper, two people si

Games with Sequential Moves Most students find the idea of rollback very simple and natural, even without drawing or understanding trees. Of course, they start by being able to

A type of auction in which the highest bidder is rewarded the object, but all bidders pay the auctioneer their bids. This differs from traditional first price auctions in which onl

QUESTION ONE. (a) The probability that, a bomber hits a target on a bombing mission is 0.70 Three bombers are sent to bomb a particular target. (i)  What is the probabilit