Priori forecasting, Corporate Finance

Chang and Fyffe (1971) assume that a ?rm has a ''long-run sales history of individual seasonal-style-goods SKUs or groups of such SKUs''. They propose to estimate demand by using regression on those historic sales, also based on the ''outcome of some observable variable''. However, they do not explain in detail how that can be done nor do they test the method using real data. It seems dif?cult to apply this method in the apparel industry, as long-run sales histories of very similar products are rare.

Chambers and Eglese (1988) discuss the use of preview demand data that are gathered by sending out a preview catalogue (whichdoes not necessarily include a full product range) to a sample comprised of several thousand regular customers and offering themthe opportunity to order products at a discount before the season starts. They assume that an aggregate forecast for the full product range is given, and propose to forecast the demand for a product line by multiplying the aggregate forecast with the fraction of total preview demand for products in that product line. They further propose a second, slightly more sophisticated forecasting method,which takes into account that the ratio of total demand to preview demand ('the scaling factor') may not be the same for all  product lines. These methods are very suitable and, indeed, have been developed for an apparel mail order company.

Thomassey and Happiette (2007) propose a decision-support system based on neural networks, which automatically performs item sales forecasting. The system is designed to deal with many characteristics of the apparel market: large number of items, short lifetimes, substitution of most items with each new collection, long lead times, and in?uence of many external factors like the weather,promotions, fashion, and the economic environment. The proposed system is composed of three steps: obtain prototypes of demand behavior using a clustering procedure on historical demand data, (2) link these prototypes to descriptive criteria (e.g. price, lifespan or materials) using a probabilistic neural network, and (3) assign each new item to a prototype based on the item's descriptive criteria. Forecasts generated by the proposed model on a set of 285 new items from a French apparel distributor have a MAPE of 147%. So, accuracy is low despite the complexity of the method. For this reason, we decided not to include this method in our comparative study. The results in Section 5 will show that the simpler methods that we do consider are all more accurate (for our data set).

Posted Date: 4/25/2013 5:26:52 AM | Location : United States

Related Discussions:- Priori forecasting, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Priori forecasting, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Priori forecasting Discussions

Write discussion on Priori forecasting
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Question: (a) Give a definition of electronic banking and electronic money. (b) Outline the main differences between smart cards, credit cards and debit cards. (c) Giv

Question 1: (a) Show the forces driving cross-border mergers that operate more strongly than the reasons for transactions that take place within a given country's border. (b

ABAN LOYD CHILES OFFSHORE LTD. Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

Question: a) Using illustrative and numerical examples, differentiate between speculation and arbitraging in the context of foreign exchange market. b) One year borrowing

Question: i) Compare and contrast the various types of fixed income securities. ii) ‘A new issue of callable bonds will generally carry a higher interest rate

Describe how to build a cash flow from an income statement.

As the company''''s sales and earnings increased, so did the demand for capital. The firm''''s needs included inventory as well as additional space to house the inventory, computer

Robert Shapprio Leasing CO (40% tax rate) I determining leae rate for a number of equipment . it is allowed to use the following accelerated depreciation rate 3 years: 25%   38%