Portfolio construction based on a factor model, Financial Management

Bond management evolution to some extent is linked to the increased volatility of the interest rate term structures which is in existence since seventies. Bond valuation can be better understood by understanding the determinants of default risk, of liquidity premia and of tax advantages that are linked to current yield. The wider use of sophisticated bonds with call or put options, sinking provisions and uncertain cash flows are proving complicated to the bond investor. Hence, building of MFMs for bonds has provided the required tools for better control of risk in bond management.

Model Specification

Model Specification can be discussed in the following manner:

  • The Single and Two Factor Duration Models: The duration concept can be taken as a crude but nevertheless powerful single risk factor model. Let us consider that for small changes in the level of interest rate, we have:

                   1370_porfolio construction factor model.png

In the above equation, Ri represents return of bond i, Pi represents price of bond i, Di indicates modified duration of bond i and ki represents yield of bond i now (YTM). This equation can be used for instantaneous change in yield and also as proxy for a short period of time. Then, the equation can be written as

                   1879_porfolio construction factor model1.png


                    1345_portfolio construction factor model1.png   represents return to bond i during time period t to t + 1.

Here, we again find a predictive model that relates to the volatility of a bond return to the volatility of its current yield, the proportional coefficient being the bond duration. This can be stated as a simple single factor mode wherein the duration of a bond is its factor exposure. This model assumes that the term structure is flat and considers only small parallel shifts.

The quality of the forecast can be improved by considering convexity, in order to predict price changes in bonds for parallel shifts in term structure. This can be shown by the following equation:

                   951_portfolio construction factor model2.png

Here, Crepresents convexity of bond i.

      This can be said as a two factor model as duration and convexity of bond become its factor exposures. This model also relies on the same simplistic assumptions of term structure and its movements.

  • The Full Term Structure MFM: Let us consider a better description of the movements in the term structure in interest rates so that the deficiencies in the earlier approaches discussed above can be corrected. Let us begin with the conventional evaluation of a bond model:

                                 274_fullterm structure.png                                                               ... (1)

 Proxy implies an approximation as interest accrual is ignored and an assumption is made that the duration is constant through time.


                   1222_portfolio construction factor model4.png

While using the above formula, the yields of the discount bonds need not be identical for different maturities. This facilitates us to incorporate more complex interest rate term structures and their realistic movements. By using equation (1) we get instantaneous movements in the discount rate term structure. If we extend it as a proxy for price variations through small time periods, we get:

                               237_portfolio construction factor model5.png

By dividing the above equation by the price of the bond and after certain manipulations we get:

                   765_portfolio construction factor model6.png

If we introduce some new notations, the above equation can be written as

                    2386_portfolio construction factor model7.png                                      ... (2)


                    1009_portfolio construction factor model8.png                           

is the return of the bond i between t and t + 1.

                    1770_portfolio construction factor model9.png       

is the fraction of the value of the bond i related to cash flow t + j.

                    297_portfolio construction factor model10.png       

is the return of the default-risk free discount bond maturing at t + j between t and t + 1.

From equation (2) it can be said that the return of a bond is a weighted average of the return of the zero-coupon bonds. In case we consider the zero-coupon bonds as factors, then, the bond exposure on them will be the fraction of its value that is related to the cash-flow of the same maturity as the zero-coupon bond.

Suppose we assume a set of predetermined set of discount maturities as given in the following table:

Table 4

3 months

6 months

1 year

2 years


7 years

10 years

15 years

Through the above set of predetermined discount maturities, we can summarize for each bond i its exposures to all zero-coupon bonds in the form of a vector notation:

                   382_portfolio construction factor model11.png

Using above equation and covariance matrix W (given) for the returns of the set of zero-coupon bonds, the variance of the return of bond i can be presented in the following way:

                   1769_portfolio construction factor model12.png

36_portfolio construction factor model13.pngrepresents the variance of the return of bond i between time t and time t + 1. This forms the foundation for a risk model. Both historical estimates as well as forecast of covariance matrix can be obtained from time series analysis of the factor returns. Thus, we now have a fully predictive risk model.

     However, this model is not limited to unrealistic assumptions of the shape and the movements of the interest rate term structure. It is also not convenient to use this model while implementing strategies for complicated movements in interest rate term structure. Such scenarios, to be translated into desired exposures for each discount maturity, need a sophisticated computer program.

Posted Date: 9/11/2012 2:30:38 AM | Location : United States

Related Discussions:- Portfolio construction based on a factor model, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Portfolio construction based on a factor model, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Portfolio construction based on a factor model Discussions

Write discussion on Portfolio construction based on a factor model
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Profit and Loss statement:   The Profit and Loss statement is the primary measure of business performance.  As the name suggests, this particular report measure whether the b

Suppose, you are working as an investment consultant in a consultancy firm and most of your clients are habitual investors, who are maintaining their own portfolios comprising of v

Definition of 'Bank Credit': The amount of credit available to a business or individual from the banking system. It is the aggregate of the amount of funds financial instituti

disscus the applicability of operating cycle in vegetable in uganda

Medium-term notes are debt instruments that can be offered continuously to an investor. An agency of the issuer offers these; and these are avai

Explain how the advent of the euro would affect international diversification strategies. Answer: As the euro-zone will have similar exchange-rate policies and monetary, the co

BSE-500 and Sectoral Indices On August 9, 1999, another new index was introduced in the market which was based on the data of 500 companies and designated as BSE-500 index. It

Nominal spread of a non-treasury bond can be defined as the difference between the bond's yield and the yield to maturity of a benchmark treasury coupon security.

Regional Banks Large banks like First Norwest, Chicago, Mellon and Crocker function regionally at the national level in a fashion same to money center banks. Regional banks ser

Q. Miller Approach of irrelevance of dividends? Discuss the Modigliani as well as Miller Approach of irrelevance of dividends. What are its drawbacks? Ans. Modigliani with M