Graphical representation of various returns, Microeconomics

Graphical Representation of Various Returns:

Diminishing Returns: If the TP curve is as shown in the adjacent Figure, then the MPL given by tanθ  is throughout less than the APL given by tanθ.  

 

1133_Graphical Representation of Various Returns.png

As APL is falling from the relation between MP and AP, MP < AP we have the adjoining Figure.   

195_Graphical Representation of Various Returns1.png

Increasing Returns Here APL rises and tan  < tanθ , for all L. Therefore, MP > AP. This is shown in the adjacent Figure.  

 

677_Graphical Representation of Various Returns2.png

 

Constant Returns Here, APL is constant and tanθ  = tan , therefore, MPL = APL as is shown by a horizontal straight line in the next Figure(a,b)   

2493_Graphical Representation of Various Returns3.png

The TP curve is such that upto point A, MP is rising and so is AP and MP > AP, as shown in the diagram below. Beyond point A, MP falls but AP rises, till the two are equated at point B. At B, AP is maximised. AP falls beyond the point B. At point C, the TP curve flattens out and therefore, MP = 0. Beyond C, MP is negative and AP is falling. Therefore, in the case of non-proportional return, both MP and AP rise, initially. MP reaches a maximum earlier than AP. When they both are equated, AP is maximised. Finally, there is a situation where both are falling. Depending on the nature of MP and AP, the production process can be divided into three stages - I, II, and III, as shown in Figure. 

Characteristics of the three stages are : 

Stage I: MP > 0, AP rising, thus MP > AP 

Stage II: MP > 0, AP falling, thus MP < AP 

Stage III: MP < 0, AP falling  

In stage I, by adding one more unit of L, the producer can increase the average productivity of all the units. Thus, it would be unwise for the producer to stop production in this stage. 

In stage III, MP < 0, so that by reducing the L input, the producer can increase the total output and save the cost of a unit of L. Therefore, it is impractical for a producer to produce in this stage. 

Hence, stage II represents the economically meaningful range. This is so because here MP > 0 and AP > MP. So that an additional L input would raise the total production. Besides, it is in this stage that the TP reaches a maximum.  

Posted Date: 10/26/2012 6:25:16 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Graphical representation of various returns, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Graphical representation of various returns, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Graphical representation of various returns Discussions

Write discussion on Graphical representation of various returns
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions

GROWTH OF REGIONAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS: We find many levels of groupings of nations in the international arena. Groups of countries that share borders often have semi-perma


At what point is the Fed likely to raise interest rates for the first time? How large are the first couple of hikes likely to be? (hints: conditional on unemployment or gdp growth

What is the theory of Second Best? Prove the theorem with the help of a diagram.

under which market structure does the banking sector fall?

Durability of the Commodity: With some commodities, we require one at a time and they are used for a very long time before they get spoilt. Examples of such goods are cars, tele

How many hours will an individual allocate to leisure if their indifference curves  between consumption goods and leisure are concave to the origin? Show in figures and explain in

output and price determination under oligopoly market structure

Official Reserve Account: This part of the balance of payments informs us about how the balance of both current and capital accounts taken together is settled.Transaction in thi