Graphical representation of various returns, Microeconomics

Graphical Representation of Various Returns:

Diminishing Returns: If the TP curve is as shown in the adjacent Figure, then the MPL given by tanθ  is throughout less than the APL given by tanθ.  

 

1133_Graphical Representation of Various Returns.png

As APL is falling from the relation between MP and AP, MP < AP we have the adjoining Figure.   

195_Graphical Representation of Various Returns1.png

Increasing Returns Here APL rises and tan  < tanθ , for all L. Therefore, MP > AP. This is shown in the adjacent Figure.  

 

677_Graphical Representation of Various Returns2.png

 

Constant Returns Here, APL is constant and tanθ  = tan , therefore, MPL = APL as is shown by a horizontal straight line in the next Figure(a,b)   

2493_Graphical Representation of Various Returns3.png

The TP curve is such that upto point A, MP is rising and so is AP and MP > AP, as shown in the diagram below. Beyond point A, MP falls but AP rises, till the two are equated at point B. At B, AP is maximised. AP falls beyond the point B. At point C, the TP curve flattens out and therefore, MP = 0. Beyond C, MP is negative and AP is falling. Therefore, in the case of non-proportional return, both MP and AP rise, initially. MP reaches a maximum earlier than AP. When they both are equated, AP is maximised. Finally, there is a situation where both are falling. Depending on the nature of MP and AP, the production process can be divided into three stages - I, II, and III, as shown in Figure. 

Characteristics of the three stages are : 

Stage I: MP > 0, AP rising, thus MP > AP 

Stage II: MP > 0, AP falling, thus MP < AP 

Stage III: MP < 0, AP falling  

In stage I, by adding one more unit of L, the producer can increase the average productivity of all the units. Thus, it would be unwise for the producer to stop production in this stage. 

In stage III, MP < 0, so that by reducing the L input, the producer can increase the total output and save the cost of a unit of L. Therefore, it is impractical for a producer to produce in this stage. 

Hence, stage II represents the economically meaningful range. This is so because here MP > 0 and AP > MP. So that an additional L input would raise the total production. Besides, it is in this stage that the TP reaches a maximum.  

Posted Date: 10/26/2012 6:25:16 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Graphical representation of various returns, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Graphical representation of various returns, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Graphical representation of various returns Discussions

Write discussion on Graphical representation of various returns
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Elasticity of Demand Price elasticity of demand measures percentage change in quantity demanded which results from a 1 % change in price.                 Price Elasticity

Determinants of Social Demand for Education Certain levels of education like the secondary school and graduate level are considered as having productive value and are attribut

What are the properties of compensared demand function

equilibrium output and prince is determined in williamson model of managerial discretion ?

Consider the model of corruption explored by Shleifer and Vishni’s where there is one government-produced good X. There is a demand for that good described by the inverse demand eq

Normal 0 false false false EN-IN X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

IMPLEMENTATION OF ECONOMIC POLICIES: Innumerable studies are available to  document these failures of policy and planning. However, there are vast differences of opinion conce

Return on Equity: It's a measure of business profitability equal to net after-tax income divided by average level of shareholders' equity in the business. Sales Tax: A tax im


CASE STUDY IN RELATION WITH TOTAL REVENUE,AVERAGE REVENUE AND MARGINAL REVENUE