Fundamentals of public health law, Business Law and Ethics

Fundamentals of Public Health Law

The Honorable Art Vandelay has been a member of the U.S. Congress for 10 years, representing the 12th District in South Caledonia. Through his career in the Congress he has been an advocate for the prevention of injuries. You are serving as Representative Vandelay's chief health legislative assistant at his Washington office on Capitol Hill. You are not a lawyer and do not have formal legal training, but you have taken an introductory course in public health law at a leading public health school in the United States. Representative Vandelay has become increasingly concerned about the rising toll of morbidity and mortality from car-surfing in her district.

In South Caledonia alone, the number of persons killed by participating in car surfing has increased four-fold over the past two years, and numerous injuries have also been reported. Two weeks ago, the son of a close friend and political supporter of Rep. Vandelay was killed while car surfing. Rep. Vandelay is considering introducing a bill in Congress to make car surfing illegal throughout the entire United States, with the purpose of reducing the number of associated deaths and injuries. He has drafted a bill, tentatively called the American Car Surfing Prohibition Act (ACSPA), which would prohibit persons from participating in car surfing in the United States, punishable by up to a $2,000 fine and up to 30 days in federal prison.

The Congressman has asked you to write a memo of no more than 600 words (Members of Congress do not like to read long memos) on a specific point concerning the advisability of introducing the ACSPA into Congress as a bill. You decide to refer his request to one of the attorneys in the office but the attorneys are out on vacation for two weeks. So, you decide to write your own memo, and then ask the attorneys to review it when they return from vacation, before you give it to Rep. Vandelay. Under the principles of federalism as expressed in the Raich case, and the federalism materials presented in class, and the assigned readings, would the ACSPA be found constitutional if it were challenged on grounds that it was not within the federal government's power under the Commerce Clause? First state your conclusion on this, and then give your reasoning.

Posted Date: 3/22/2013 2:55:51 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Fundamentals of public health law, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Fundamentals of public health law, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Fundamentals of public health law Discussions

Write discussion on Fundamentals of public health law
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Illustrate the example of the Policy Clustering Countries democratize because of political or economic pressures within their country pressures that exist simultaneously for le

Question 1 Describe the term banking. What are the acceptable businesses for a banking company as per BR Act 1949 Question 2 When is a negotiable apparatus considered as dish

Assignments submitted after the due date in the absence of an extension will incur a marking penalty. An extension must be applied for in writing before the due date. Extension app

Judges of Appeal, Attorney and Registrar Judges of Appeal However a "judge of appeal" is a judge that who is appointed to the Court of Appeal. Attorney - General

COMMENCEMENT: However section 46(4) of the constitution offers that like, a law made through Parliament shall not come in operation whether it has been published in the Englan

Moto Knappy is a manufacturer of automobile motors. The manufacturing process takes a couple of months. The company produces several standard and custom models. To simplify this

Recovery of Premium - S. 44 One partner has paid a premium for another on entering in a partnership to a fixed term such and the partnership is dissolved previous to the expir

Legal Procedures: The court may order the examination in private or public (ie. open court) of an officer of a company in liquidation or of any person known or suspected to ha

Payment to Promoters:   A promoter has no legal right against the company he promotes. The main reason is that the company did not ask him to promote it, and because the compa

Issue of additional preference shares: In the Bristol Aeroplane Case it was said of the issue of additional preference shares that:                    "the existing prefere