Fundamentals of public health law, Business Law and Ethics

Fundamentals of Public Health Law

The Honorable Art Vandelay has been a member of the U.S. Congress for 10 years, representing the 12th District in South Caledonia. Through his career in the Congress he has been an advocate for the prevention of injuries. You are serving as Representative Vandelay's chief health legislative assistant at his Washington office on Capitol Hill. You are not a lawyer and do not have formal legal training, but you have taken an introductory course in public health law at a leading public health school in the United States. Representative Vandelay has become increasingly concerned about the rising toll of morbidity and mortality from car-surfing in her district.

In South Caledonia alone, the number of persons killed by participating in car surfing has increased four-fold over the past two years, and numerous injuries have also been reported. Two weeks ago, the son of a close friend and political supporter of Rep. Vandelay was killed while car surfing. Rep. Vandelay is considering introducing a bill in Congress to make car surfing illegal throughout the entire United States, with the purpose of reducing the number of associated deaths and injuries. He has drafted a bill, tentatively called the American Car Surfing Prohibition Act (ACSPA), which would prohibit persons from participating in car surfing in the United States, punishable by up to a $2,000 fine and up to 30 days in federal prison.

The Congressman has asked you to write a memo of no more than 600 words (Members of Congress do not like to read long memos) on a specific point concerning the advisability of introducing the ACSPA into Congress as a bill. You decide to refer his request to one of the attorneys in the office but the attorneys are out on vacation for two weeks. So, you decide to write your own memo, and then ask the attorneys to review it when they return from vacation, before you give it to Rep. Vandelay. Under the principles of federalism as expressed in the Raich case, and the federalism materials presented in class, and the assigned readings, would the ACSPA be found constitutional if it were challenged on grounds that it was not within the federal government's power under the Commerce Clause? First state your conclusion on this, and then give your reasoning.

Posted Date: 3/22/2013 2:55:51 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Fundamentals of public health law, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Fundamentals of public health law, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Fundamentals of public health law Discussions

Write discussion on Fundamentals of public health law
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Complaints made against the auditors: These are the most simple principles that such have to be applied to cases of this description. I protest, however, against the notion

Question 1: (a) What are the considerations that apply for a computer contract? (b) How is Industrial Property protected in Mauritius? Question 2: Explain the princi

Assignment of Share in Partnership Whereas as has been stated, never new partner may be bring in without the consent of all other partners as well like accordingly no partner

Types oF Goods - Sales of Goods Further the Act classifies goods into: like; (i) Specific Goods Whether specific goods are "goods" like are acknowledged and agreed on

Fraudulent Trading: Under s.323, if the court finds that the business of a company in liquidation has been carried on with intent to defraud creditors or for any fraudulent pu

A landowner has a duty to protect a person that enters his/her property from injury.  If the person is a guest or licensee, then it is a higher duty of care.  However, the landowne

State the term - monetary policy coordination Criticisms have been put forward on proposals for enhanced fiscal and monetary policy coordination. This policy coordination might

Remedies of the Buyer - Sales of Goods (a)Damages for non-delivery Section number 51 (1) provides that whether the seller wrongfully neglects or refuses to deliver the go

QUESTION 1 (a) Compare and contrast the different rules and features governing the burden and standard of proof in both civil and criminal cases (b) The art of advocacy is n

QUESTION 1 Enumerate and comment upon the number and nature of the grounds on the basis of which a citizen may challenge the decision of a public body. Illustrate your answer w