Fraction defective p chart - control charts for attributes, Operation Management

Fraction Defective P Chart - Control Charts for Attributes

This type of chart is used when it is impractical or inconvenient to maintain a constant sample size. Instead of plotting the number of defectives in each sample, the proportion (p) or fraction of defectives is calculated and then plotted. Clearly, to ensure that meaningful plots are made, the sample sizes must be large enough to ensure that a number of defectives will typically be found. This may seem to imply that some level of non-conformance is being accepted, but this is not necessarily so. For example, consider the Go/Not-go gauging example shown in the figure on page 249. Whilst the design limits of size on the component diameter might be, say, 24.98 mm and 25.02 mm; for process control purposes the gaps in the gauge might be set at, say, 24.99 and 25.01 respectively. Remembering that, for attributes, only two states are possible (defective/non defective) the relevant probability distribution is the binomial distribution, the mean of which (¯p) can be estimated by inspecting a large number of items:

¯p = total number of defectives/ total number inspected

An estimate of the standard deviation of the binomial distribution (σp), for samples of size n is given by:

σp = √(¯p (1-¯p) / n)

For small values of n the profiles of the binomial distributions are distinctly skewed, but, for large values of n and, particularly, when the product p n is greater than about 5, the distributions are sufficiently symmetrical to be well-approximated by the normal distribution. In this latter situation the control chart limits can be determined in the same manner as for variables charts.

2206_Fraction Defective P Chart - Control Charts for Attributes.png

It will be realised that the implied constant sample size (n) in these expressions presents some difficulty in a procedure when the sample size is allowed to vary. This can be surmounted by using an average value for n, and limiting variation in the size of subsequent samples to, say, ±20 per cent of this value: the results will still be sufficiently accurate for most process control purposes.

Posted Date: 3/16/2013 1:41:42 AM | Location : United States

Related Discussions:- Fraction defective p chart - control charts for attributes, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Fraction defective p chart - control charts for attributes, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Fraction defective p chart - control charts for attributes Discussions

Write discussion on Fraction defective p chart - control charts for attributes
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions

Explain OR Models

Calculate the present value of the cash flow stream in problem 2 with the following interest rates- 1. Year 1 = 8% 2. Year 2 = 6% 3. Year 3 = 10% 4. Year 4 = 4% 5. Year 5 = 6% 6. Y

1) Discuss the differences between transnationals and global corporations. 2) Compare political risk in the US to that of Egypt. Is there more in one country and what is the imp

Explain d ifference between Classical Theory and Neo-Classical Theory of Organisation. Difference between Classical Theory and Neo-Classical Theory of Organisation : The c

The following table shows financial data for Costco and wal mart: CostcoInventories: $3,643Sales (net): $48106COGS: $41651 Wal Mart:Inventories: $29447Sales (net): $286103COG

After working for 30 years, Ramjee Somjee Dutt opted for VRS and started a courier company and did very well in the first four years. He was now looking for expansion of his busine

Explain why it is important to carry out a rough-cut capacity planning check on critical resources before proceeding with the development of the final master production schedule

What are two reasons project management is not well done in corporations? Why? What are some specific examples?

the purpose of the design activity in companies is to come up with products/services which willsatisfy the needs of customers/clients. which one of the fololowing statements is inc