Fraction defective p chart - control charts for attributes, Operation Management

Fraction Defective P Chart - Control Charts for Attributes

This type of chart is used when it is impractical or inconvenient to maintain a constant sample size. Instead of plotting the number of defectives in each sample, the proportion (p) or fraction of defectives is calculated and then plotted. Clearly, to ensure that meaningful plots are made, the sample sizes must be large enough to ensure that a number of defectives will typically be found. This may seem to imply that some level of non-conformance is being accepted, but this is not necessarily so. For example, consider the Go/Not-go gauging example shown in the figure on page 249. Whilst the design limits of size on the component diameter might be, say, 24.98 mm and 25.02 mm; for process control purposes the gaps in the gauge might be set at, say, 24.99 and 25.01 respectively. Remembering that, for attributes, only two states are possible (defective/non defective) the relevant probability distribution is the binomial distribution, the mean of which (¯p) can be estimated by inspecting a large number of items:

¯p = total number of defectives/ total number inspected

An estimate of the standard deviation of the binomial distribution (σp), for samples of size n is given by:

σp = √(¯p (1-¯p) / n)

For small values of n the profiles of the binomial distributions are distinctly skewed, but, for large values of n and, particularly, when the product p n is greater than about 5, the distributions are sufficiently symmetrical to be well-approximated by the normal distribution. In this latter situation the control chart limits can be determined in the same manner as for variables charts.

2206_Fraction Defective P Chart - Control Charts for Attributes.png

It will be realised that the implied constant sample size (n) in these expressions presents some difficulty in a procedure when the sample size is allowed to vary. This can be surmounted by using an average value for n, and limiting variation in the size of subsequent samples to, say, ±20 per cent of this value: the results will still be sufficiently accurate for most process control purposes.

Posted Date: 3/16/2013 1:41:42 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Fraction defective p chart - control charts for attributes, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Fraction defective p chart - control charts for attributes, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Fraction defective p chart - control charts for attributes Discussions

Write discussion on Fraction defective p chart - control charts for attributes
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Role of Production Planning and Control in Operation Management Operations are at the centre of the diagram in figure given below because they are the dynamic doing elements o

application of operations research in managerial decision making


What do you think make up the concept, package and process for the adventure playground?

What types of people have more difficulty being team players? What helps promote good team player behaviour? 3. What do you think is more important for a good IT professional: stro

what are the characteristics of a good model

Assume a fixed cost for a process of $15,000. The variable cost to produce each unit of product is $10 and the selling price for the finished product is $25. Which of the following

Perfect Face Cream ran a commercial to showcase its new Wrinkle-Free Face Cream. The commercial showed an older woman with severe wrinkles followed by images of that same woman aft

Commercial and personal Websites, as well as print media, design their formats and include visuals for optimal audience appeal. Select a Website or print medium for this reflective

Strategic Alignment Please respond to the following- Considering your current job (or one you hope to have in the future), discuss the best way to link your job performance to t