Fraction defective p chart - control charts for attributes, Operation Management

Fraction Defective P Chart - Control Charts for Attributes

This type of chart is used when it is impractical or inconvenient to maintain a constant sample size. Instead of plotting the number of defectives in each sample, the proportion (p) or fraction of defectives is calculated and then plotted. Clearly, to ensure that meaningful plots are made, the sample sizes must be large enough to ensure that a number of defectives will typically be found. This may seem to imply that some level of non-conformance is being accepted, but this is not necessarily so. For example, consider the Go/Not-go gauging example shown in the figure on page 249. Whilst the design limits of size on the component diameter might be, say, 24.98 mm and 25.02 mm; for process control purposes the gaps in the gauge might be set at, say, 24.99 and 25.01 respectively. Remembering that, for attributes, only two states are possible (defective/non defective) the relevant probability distribution is the binomial distribution, the mean of which (¯p) can be estimated by inspecting a large number of items:

¯p = total number of defectives/ total number inspected

An estimate of the standard deviation of the binomial distribution (σp), for samples of size n is given by:

σp = √(¯p (1-¯p) / n)

For small values of n the profiles of the binomial distributions are distinctly skewed, but, for large values of n and, particularly, when the product p n is greater than about 5, the distributions are sufficiently symmetrical to be well-approximated by the normal distribution. In this latter situation the control chart limits can be determined in the same manner as for variables charts.

2206_Fraction Defective P Chart - Control Charts for Attributes.png

It will be realised that the implied constant sample size (n) in these expressions presents some difficulty in a procedure when the sample size is allowed to vary. This can be surmounted by using an average value for n, and limiting variation in the size of subsequent samples to, say, ±20 per cent of this value: the results will still be sufficiently accurate for most process control purposes.

Posted Date: 3/16/2013 1:41:42 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Fraction defective p chart - control charts for attributes, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Fraction defective p chart - control charts for attributes, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Fraction defective p chart - control charts for attributes Discussions

Write discussion on Fraction defective p chart - control charts for attributes
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Describe how OD interventions need to be adapted to fit different cultural contexts.

The long-term relationship between the inventory, throughput, and flow time of a production system in steady state is called which of the following?

I cannot seem to answer EX. 4a, b and c. from ISN# 978-0-13-274395-2 Pearson Chopra 5th Edition. You provide solutions to discussions questions but not chapter exercises. The probl

After reviewing the RFP Tutorial from the lecture this week, share your thoughts about the steps outlined for creating an RFP. What value does an RFP bring to finding and buying th


What are the characteristics of service organisations? The characteristics of service organisations are as given below: a. Intangibility for illustrations no physical subs

Find a news article with homicide Provide a brief description of the crime. What does the crime data suggest about this type of crime? Does the article discuss the motive for the c

In this research paper, you will research cloud computing and Web 2.0 and write a two- to four-page (500-1000 word) research paper explaining the business uses of each. Using the i

Enron hid debt in secret accounts. Johnson and Johnson removed all Tylenol from shelves when the integrity of the product was questioned. What business concept discussed in this co

How should the firm carry out the environmental scanning process? What would the process be of any practical value?