Fraction defective p chart - control charts for attributes, Operation Management

Fraction Defective P Chart - Control Charts for Attributes

This type of chart is used when it is impractical or inconvenient to maintain a constant sample size. Instead of plotting the number of defectives in each sample, the proportion (p) or fraction of defectives is calculated and then plotted. Clearly, to ensure that meaningful plots are made, the sample sizes must be large enough to ensure that a number of defectives will typically be found. This may seem to imply that some level of non-conformance is being accepted, but this is not necessarily so. For example, consider the Go/Not-go gauging example shown in the figure on page 249. Whilst the design limits of size on the component diameter might be, say, 24.98 mm and 25.02 mm; for process control purposes the gaps in the gauge might be set at, say, 24.99 and 25.01 respectively. Remembering that, for attributes, only two states are possible (defective/non defective) the relevant probability distribution is the binomial distribution, the mean of which (¯p) can be estimated by inspecting a large number of items:

¯p = total number of defectives/ total number inspected

An estimate of the standard deviation of the binomial distribution (σp), for samples of size n is given by:

σp = √(¯p (1-¯p) / n)

For small values of n the profiles of the binomial distributions are distinctly skewed, but, for large values of n and, particularly, when the product p n is greater than about 5, the distributions are sufficiently symmetrical to be well-approximated by the normal distribution. In this latter situation the control chart limits can be determined in the same manner as for variables charts.

2206_Fraction Defective P Chart - Control Charts for Attributes.png

It will be realised that the implied constant sample size (n) in these expressions presents some difficulty in a procedure when the sample size is allowed to vary. This can be surmounted by using an average value for n, and limiting variation in the size of subsequent samples to, say, ±20 per cent of this value: the results will still be sufficiently accurate for most process control purposes.

Posted Date: 3/16/2013 1:41:42 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Fraction defective p chart - control charts for attributes, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Fraction defective p chart - control charts for attributes, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Fraction defective p chart - control charts for attributes Discussions

Write discussion on Fraction defective p chart - control charts for attributes
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Toon Town Toy Company is considering the elimination of its Packaging Department. Management has received an offer from an outside firm to supply all Toon Town's packaging needs. T

How are multi-skill staff and multipurpose machinery flexible? Multi skilled operatives permit greater flexibility and economies of scope. For example quite than just being a m

30 year mortgage at 10 percent interest rate. Loan amount $300000. 1. What is the amortization schedule for the 1st year (12moonths) 2. What is the remaining balance of the 29years

impact of computer integration in operation management

What do you think are the biggest barriers to wide-scale adoption of m-commerce by consumers? Who do you think is working on solutions to these problems and what might the solution

Why is forecasting important in organizations, especially as related to understanding the relevant time horizon to develop a forecast against? What are some examples from industry?

What does the project portfolio illustrate? How might it be useful to management?

All of the following convetions are widely adopted project teams create the second level of the project Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) EXCEPT: A. The second level may be organized

Rate, from the best to the worst, each of the sources you indicated in #1 above as being sources you will use in your analysis in terms of its probable reliability. Discuss the ste

A firm uses a serial assembly system and needs answers to the following- a. A desired output of 900 units per shift (7.5 hours) is desired for a new processing system. The syst