Formulate the situation as strategic game - nash equilibrium, Game Theory

Two individuals use a common resource (a river or a forest, for example) to produce output. The more the resource is used, the less output any given individual can produce. Denote by xi the amount of the resource used by individual i (where i = 1, 2). Assume specifically that individual i's output is xi(1 (x1 + x2)) if x1 + x2 < 1 and zero otherwise. Each individual i chooses xi ? [0, 1] to maximize her output.

(a) Formulate this situation as a strategic game.

(b) Find the best response correspondences of the players.

(c) Find its Nash equilibria.

(d) Does the Nash equilibrium value of x1; x2 maximize the total output? (Is there any other output pro le that results in a higher total output than the Nash equilibrium?)

(e) Suppose now there are n individuals and hence the payoff function of individual i (where i = 1; 2;...; n) is given by xi(1 (x1 +x2 + ... +xn)) if x1 +x2 +...+xn 6 1 and zero otherwise. Find the Nash equilibria of this game.

 

Posted Date: 3/23/2013 3:56:31 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Formulate the situation as strategic game - nash equilibrium, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Formulate the situation as strategic game - nash equilibrium, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Formulate the situation as strategic game - nash equilibrium Discussions

Write discussion on Formulate the situation as strategic game - nash equilibrium
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
A bid that indicates totally different costs for various quantitites of the item offered for sale. A series of price-quantity mixtures is tendered to the auctioneer.

A strategy consisting of potential moves and a chance distribution (collection of weights) that corresponds to how frequently every move is to be played. A player would solely use

1.a.out 2 1 Here is the grid that has been generated: 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0

Equilibrium payoffs are (2, 3, 2). Player A’s equilib- rium strategy is “N and then N if b follows N or N if d follows N” or “Always N.” Player B’s equilibrium strategy is “b if N

A game frequently displayed in tv police dramas. 2 partners in crime are separated into separate rooms at the police station and given an identical deal. If one implicates the oppo

Scenario Two conspirators are arrested and interrogated separately. If one implicates the opposite, he might go free whereas the opposite receives a life sentence. Yet, if each

a) Show that A counting proof could be fun(?). But any old proof will do. (Note that the coefficients (1,2,1) in the above are just the elements of the second row of Pas

A Nash equilibrium, named when John Nash, may be a set of methods, one for every player, such that no player has incentive to unilaterally amendment her action. Players are in equi

Combining Simultaneous and  Sequential Moves The material in this chapter covers a variety of issues that require some knowledge of the analysis of both sequential- move

A non-cooperative game is one during which players are unable to form enforceable contracts outside of these specifically modeled within the game. Hence, it's not outlined as games