Finiteness problem for regular languages, Theory of Computation

The fact that the Recognition Problem is decidable gives us another algorithm for deciding Emptiness. The pumping lemma tells us that if every string x ∈ L(A) which has length greater than n (where n is the number of states in the minimal DFA recognizing this language and, therefore, no greater than the number of states in this particular DFA) can be split into three components uvw, where |v| > 0 and uviw ∈ L(A) for all i ≥ 0. One consequence of this is that L(A) will be non-empty iff it includes some string of length strictly less than n. To see this, assume (for contradiction) that no string in L(A) was of length less than n. Let x be a minimal length string in L(A), so no string in A is shorter than x. By our assumption |x| ≥ n. Then the pumping lemma applies and x must have the form uvw, etc. But then uw ∈ L(A) also and |uw| < |uvw| contradicting the choice of x as a minimal length string. Hence the shortest string in L(A), whatever it is, must have length strictly less than n. To decide Emptiness, then, all we need to do is to systematically generate all strings in Σ∗ with length less than n (the de?nition of Σ∗ provides the foundation of an algorithm for doing this) and check to see if A accepts any of them. We return "True" iff it accepts at least one. (Thus, the Emptiness Problem reduces to the Recognition Problem.)

Theorem (Finiteness) The Finiteness Problem for Regular Languages is decidable.

Posted Date: 3/21/2013 1:53:59 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Finiteness problem for regular languages, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Finiteness problem for regular languages, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Finiteness problem for regular languages Discussions

Write discussion on Finiteness problem for regular languages
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
We saw earlier that LT is not closed under concatenation. If we think in terms of the LT graphs, recognizing the concatenation of LT languages would seem to require knowing, while


State & prove pumping lemma for regular set. Show that for the language L={ap |p is a prime} is not regular

i want to do projects for theory of computation subject what topics should be best.

c program to convert dfa to re

build a TM that enumerate even set of even length string over a

draw pda for l={an,bm,an/m,n>=0} n is in superscript

Construct a PDA that accepts { x#y | x, y in {a, b}* such that x ? y and xi = yi for some i, 1 = i = min(|x|, |y|) }. For your PDA to work correctly it will need to be non-determin

Differentiate between DFA and NFA. Convert the following Regular Expression into DFA. (0+1)*(01*+10*)*(0+1)*. Also write a regular grammar for this DFA.

Claim Under the assumptions above, if there is an algorithm for checking a problem then there is an algorithm for solving the problem. Before going on, you should think a bit about