Evidence favouring the big bang, Science

Evidence Favouring the Big Bang

One piece of evidence comes from the expansion of  the universe which we have already described. The expanding universe suggests that the matter was packed much more densely in  the early stages of  the universe. The proof for this also comes from the distant objects quasars. When we  'look'  at quasars situated 6 to 8 billion light years away, wc are looking at them as they existed  then.  If  the universe were more dense in that epoch, we should be able to sce some evidence of  that density in  the quasars. We do  see such high density among thc quasars. Another substantial hit of  evidcncc for the Big Bang theory comci from  thc cosmic background  radiation.

For many years the astronomers believed that if  there was a .cosmic explosion long ago, radiation from that event should still exist within the universe. This radiation may be weak, it may have lost its energy due to the expansion and cooling of  the universe, but it should exist. Radio-astronomers have, indeed, discovered faint signals-a  constantly present background  radio noise that pervades allspace.

Calculations done by astrophysicists show that this radiation, called the cosmic microwave background  radiation, is a relic of  the ancient past when the universe was inits first  throes  of  creation  in  the Big  Bang. An additional discovery made by astronomers in the past two decades is that of  the primordial abundance of  elements, i.e.  the elements hydrogen and helium first createdin the aftermath of  creation are found to be most abundant in the universe.

By examining the light coming from the various parts of  the universe, astronomers have found out that, out of every 100 atoms, almost 93 are hydrogen atoms and seven are helium atoms. Elements heavier than helium are present  in traces only. This suggests that the universe started out with a Big Bang from a very hot and dense state and quickly cooled as it expanded. The hot and dense conditions lasted long enough for some hydrogen to fuse into helium. But they did not last long to allow other heavier elements to form  in significant amounts. These were made much later in the interior ofmassive stars.    

Posted Date: 9/28/2012 1:51:01 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Evidence favouring the big bang, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Evidence favouring the big bang, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Evidence favouring the big bang Discussions

Write discussion on Evidence favouring the big bang
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Explain the Constituents and Examination of Urine The quantity of urine in 24 hours in adult normal individual varies from 600 ml to 2500 ml. It is pale yellow in colour, hyper


Explain Genetic Theory of ageing Rate of ageing varies between species. The difference is in the genetic changes in the species. Thus it can be said that gradual impairment of

Deductive logic: Deductive logic may be  considered as the opposite of  induction. Here the reasoning is more direct. If  we know a statement about a whole class of objects, ph

The rain cycle You can reproduce the rain cycle in miniature in your classroom. Place a box of plant seedlings on the table. Place a metal tray about 35 to 40 cm above the box



What determines sinking and floating? Shape a piece of lead, tin or aluminium foil into the form of a little boat and float it on the water in a pan; now wad the metal foil fro

A Cloud Made of Comets The cold outer areas beyond Pluto are the regions of  comets, those visitors that dash, around the Sun, seldom to be seen again. Comets are of grei3t

3 human adaptations to help differential survivability, and three re differential fecundity