Demonstrate knowledge of basic element and law of contract , Business Law and Ethics

Learning Outcomes:

• Demonstrate knowledge of the basic elements of a contract
• Demonstrate knowledge of which of those elements are pertinent to potential disputes within this scenario
• Apply the principles established in cases studied to the facts of this scenario
• Support those principles with legal authorities. Cases must be given full citations.
• Reach a reasoned conclusion based on the above
• Demonstrate acceptable standards of communication skills in terms of written English (grammar, punctuation, paragraphing etc.)

The Question

Kim and Terri had decided to go shopping in Bluewater. Kim had been looking everywhere for a new dress for her sister's wedding and was prepared to pay up to £150. She passed a smart little boutique, which had just opened and stopped in her tracks. There in the window was the dress of her dreams, which, being a great follower of fashion, she knew was made by Sharmani and should retail for at least £500. It was clearly labelled at £50.

The dress was the only one in the store, Kim asked to try it on, it fitted perfectly and she went to the counter with her £50 ready in her hand.Lynne, the owner of the boutique said that she was sorry, but there had been a mistake and stated that the dress cost £450 and refused to sell it for the price on the label.

Kim, who is a part time law student at the University of North Dulwich said, ‘I know my rights! I have studied contract law and you have to sell this dress to me at the price in the window.'

Terri, meanwhile,is an avid reader of ‘Charm' magazine and had seen an advertisement the day before, which read;

‘Special Offer to readers of ‘Charm' magazine! The first six customers to present this advertisement at the enquiry desk on the ground floor of the Jack Jones department store are entitled to a free outfit of their choice, worth £100.'

Terri had got up early and was third in line at the enquiry desk, when the shop opened. She is furious because the store is refusing to honour ‘the offer', saying that it was just a publicity stunt and no-one was expected to take it seriously.

Please advise Lynne whether she is legally obliged to sell the dress to Kim at the stated price of £50 and Terri whether she is legally entitled to the £100 outfit. (You are only expected to use legal principles which you have covered in class. You are not expected to discuss the law on mistake.)

Posted Date: 2/15/2013 1:33:48 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Demonstrate knowledge of basic element and law of contract , Assignment Help, Ask Question on Demonstrate knowledge of basic element and law of contract , Get Answer, Expert's Help, Demonstrate knowledge of basic element and law of contract Discussions

Write discussion on Demonstrate knowledge of basic element and law of contract
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Recommendations for addressing phoenix activities Over the past two decades there have been a significant range of proposals for addressing phoenix activity. Most of these opt

Business and Social Agreements Business Agreements Therefore is a rebuttable presumption that parties intended generate a legally enforceable agreement to example in Cr

Capacity - Sales of goods Through S.4 (1) provides such capacity to buy and to sell is governed through the natural law concerning capacity for contract. Although where necess

What are the advantages of doctrine of judicial precedent? Advantages of doctrine of judicial precedent: a. Makes it more clearly in terms of chances of winning case should

Question 1: Critically analyse the major changes brought to Industrial Relations by the Employment Relations Act 2008? Question 2: Write short notes on the followings:

Remuneration:             Article 108 provides that "a managing director shall receive such remuneration (whether by way of salary plus commission or may participation in earn

Determine the primary criticism of the stages model The primary criticism of the stages model is that it tends to be front-loaded, which means, more attention is paid to policy

1. Joe is walking down the street and Sue comes up behind Joe, aims a gun at him, but stops just before shooting. Joe did not know Sue was coming up behind him.

Contracts of Guarantee There the Law of Contract Act, 1961, S.3 (1) provides as follow: Actually "No suit shall be brought whereby to charge the defendant upon any type of

QUORUM: However a quorum is the minimum number of persons who must be present at a meeting in order that the meeting may validly transact the business for that it was convened