Declaration and payment, Business Law and Ethics

Declaration and Payment:

There is no provision in the Act dealing with payment of dividends. It is therefore governed by the provisions of the company's articles, failing which the provisions of Table A which are as follows:

i) Article 114

The company in general meeting may declare dividends, whether no dividend shall exceed the amount recommended by the directors. The use of the word "may" means that the company in general meeting is not bound to declare dividends even if the directors have recommend a particular amount. On the other hand, no dividend can be declared if the directors have recommended none.

ii) Article 115

The directors may from time to time pay to the members such interim dividends as appear to the directors to be justified by the profits of the company. Moreover a resolution passed at a general meeting directing the directors to pay interim dividends is invalid. Scott v Scott (56)

iii) Article 116

No dividend shall be paid otherwise than out of profits. In Verner v General & Commercial Investment Trust Lindley, J expressed the view that, because the word "profits" is somewhat ambiguous, this provision should be understood to mean that "dividends should not be paid out of capital". Furthermore provided the dividend is not paid out of capital, it does not matter from whatever fund it is paid, whether called profits or otherwise.

iv) Article 118

Subject to the rights of persons, whether any entitled to shares by special rights as to dividend, all such dividends shall be declared  plus paid according to the amounts paid or credited as paid on the shares in respect whereof the dividend is paid. This provision modifies the common law rule that dividends are paid on the nominal value of the shares: Oak Bank Co. v Cram.

v)  Article 120

Any general meeting declaring a dividend may direct payment of such dividend wholly or partly by the distribution of specific assets and in particular of paid-up shares, debentures or any one or more of such ways. This article gives the company power to pay dividend in kind. In the absence of such a provision, dividend is payable in cash and the company may be restrained from paying it in any other form: Wood v Odessa Waterworks Co. (57)

Posted Date: 1/12/2013 4:34:33 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Declaration and payment, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Declaration and payment, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Declaration and payment Discussions

Write discussion on Declaration and payment
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Change of Business Name:  Section 17(4) of the Registration of Business Names Act provides that if - (a)     any company is, through inadvertence or otherwise, registered un

Explain about the tort of negligence. A form of civil wrong where a contract doesn’t exist among the two parties and this is not a crime where punishment is the major goal to t

Spill over Effects of Monetary Policy There are three broad ways in which aggregate demand policies in one country can spillover to affect another country. These are the real i

a) Sometime in the mid 21st century the Jones-Markus experiment attempted to create a capuchin monkey with human intelligence. The experiment, however, outdid its intentions by se

QUESTION 1 (a) Describe the main stages of money laundering? (b) Is the current Mauritian Banking Act strong enough to protect depositors and maintain financial stability gi

Define the committee stage as parliamentary procedures. Committee Stage: Now the Bill is discussed and amended in detail through a committee made up of representatives in

Profit and Loss Account: with s.148(1) the directors of every company shall, at some date not soon than eighteen months later than the incorporation of the company and subsequ

HUMAN RIGHTS   Human rights are something which we frequently hear about, discuss, and have probably read a great deal on as well. Most political and social discussions revolve ar

Question 1: (a) In the Mauritian Legal System, there is a hierarchy of courts. Describe the various courts. (b) State and critically examine the features of the 5 main sour

Stakeholders emphasised that a coordinated, whole of government approach is necessary to mitigate phoenix activity. Stakeholders also emphasised that options should recognise th