Debt holders versus shareholders, Financial Management

Debt holders versus Shareholders

A second agency problem arises because of potential conflict between stockholders and creditors. Creditors lend finances to the firm at rates which are based on:

  1. Riskiness of the firm's existing assets
  2. Expectations concerning the riskiness of future assets additions
  3. The firm's existing capital structure
  4. Expectations regarding future capital structure modifications.


These are the factors which determine the riskiness of the firm's cash flows and therefore the safety of its debt issue. Shareholders (acting via management) might make decisions that will cause the firm's risk to change. This will influence the value of debt. The firm might raise the level of debt to boost profits.  This will decrease the value of old debt since it raises the risk of the firm.

Creditors will defend themselves against the above troubles through:

(A) Insisting on uncertain covenants to be incorporated in the debt contract. Such covenants might limit:

•    The company’s benefit base
•    The company’s capability to get additional debts
•    The company’s capability to pay future dividend and management compensation.
•    The management capability to make future judgment (control associated covenants)

(B) When creditors observe that shareholders are trying to take benefit of them in unethical manners, they will either decline to deal further with the firm or else will need a much higher than normal rate of interest to recompense for the risks of such feasible exploitations.

It thus follows that shareholders wealth maximization need fair play with creditors. This is as shareholders wealth based on continued access to capital markets that depends on fair play by shareholders as far as creditor's interests are anxious.

Posted Date: 12/8/2012 6:58:45 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Debt holders versus shareholders, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Debt holders versus shareholders, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Debt holders versus shareholders Discussions

Write discussion on Debt holders versus shareholders
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Q. Merits of net present value method? Merits of NPV method:- (i) Time value of funds is taken into consideration: - For the reason that this method takes into account the t

You plan to borrow $125,000 at a 9.5% annual interest rate. The terms require you to amortize the loan with 10 equal end-of-year payments. How much interest would you be paying i

Calendar Studies These attempted to predict rates of return during a calendar year and examine if there is any particular observable pattern in the rates of return on the stock

Additional information required Specification of a time scale for the evaluation. Predict cash flow details year by year for period specified in the time scale. An approxima

Under what circumstance would the U.S. dollar and the Canadian dollar be said to have achieved purchasing power parity? The U.S. dollar and the Canadian dollar possible conside

The financial manager of A ltd.co. expects that its EBIT in the current year is 10,000. The firm has 5% Deb. Amounting to Rs. 40,000., while 10% Pref. Share amounts to Rs. 20,000.

Q. Define Double-Entry Bookkeeping? Double-Entry Bookkeeping - Method of recording financial transactions in that every transaction is entered in two or more accounts and inclu

How would you incorporate political risk into the capital budgeting process of foreign investment projects? One method is to adjust the cost of capital upward to imitate politi

Is book value the best proxy to the value of the shares? No. According to A6 it would be a miracle if the number that appears in the Shareholders' Equity had anything to do wit

Assume a bank charges a 15.5% APR (annual percentage rate) on credit card holder compounds quarterly. What EAR (effective annual rate) is the bank is charging? What if they change