Comparison between absorption and marginal costing, Cost Accounting

Comparison between Absorption and Marginal Costing

Marginal Costing like a cost accounting system is considerably different from absorption costing. It is an optionally method of accounting for costs and profit, that refuses the principles of absorbing fixed overhead into unit costs.

In Marginal costing:

Closing stocks are valued on marginal production cost, Fixed costs are charged in full against the profit of the duration whether they are incurred.

In absorption costing occasionally referred to like full costing:

  1. Closing stocks are valued at full production cost, and involving a share of fixed production and involve a share of fixed production costs.
  2. Because of the cost of sales in a period will involve some fixed overhead incurred in a previous duration in opening stock values and will eliminate some fixed overhead incurred in the recent period however carried forward in closing stock values like a charge to a subsequent accounting duration.

This distinction among absorption costing and marginal costing is very significant and the contrast among the systems should be clearly understood. Works carefully via the following example to ensure about you are familiar along with both methods.

Posted Date: 2/6/2013 12:25:29 AM | Location : United States

Related Discussions:- Comparison between absorption and marginal costing, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Comparison between absorption and marginal costing, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Comparison between absorption and marginal costing Discussions

Write discussion on Comparison between absorption and marginal costing
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Organization of Budgetary Control Budgetary control ideally includes the given steps as: 1. The creation of budget centres. 2. The introduction of sufficient

I'm having a hard time with this, can you please help? I know the dates are imparative also in finding the solution. Stevens purchased an auto on Jan 1, 2001. On December 31, 2003

Why do we separate factory overhead from materials and labor?

The controller for U.S. Route 66 Truck Parts is comparing traditional overhead allocationwith ABC. After studying both approaches, the controller prepared the following list of fea

Group Bonus Plan There are specific operations or jobs that require to be done collectively via a group of workers, as an example of, continuous production work flows in asse

STANDARD COSTING STANDARD COSTING is a method, which uses standards for costs and revenues for the idea of control by variance analysis. It can be used either through operation

Determine Profit in Long-Term To demonstrate the point about profit in the long-term, let us assume that a company sells and makes a single product.  There are no opening stoc

A small company employing around 25 people manufactures and sells anthropometric measuring equipment - equipment used mainly in hospitals to measure the height and other dimensions

Baka Corporation applies manufacturing overhead on the basis of direct labor-hours. At the beginning of the most recent year, the company based its predetermined overhead rate on t

Piece Rate System - Labour Remuneration However an employee is paid a fixed amount for all units produced irrespective of time in use; the wages payable are computed like fo