Case study in game theory - color coordination, Game Theory

Game 1 Color Coordination (with Delay)

594_Color coordination.png

This game should be played twice, once without the delay tactic and once with it, to show the difference between out- comes in the simultaneous and sequential versions. As usual, the game can be played by pairs of students, although it can also be played by all students simultaneously with the left- hand side of the room's playing against the right-hand side. Tell the students not to write down anything (except their names) until they hear all of the instructions. As with the tacit coordination game, you might want to provide some inducement for coordination here; chocolate usually works well.

Ask the students to choose partners from the other side of the room or have them imagine that each is playing with one person who is sitting on the other side of the room. Each student will eventually be asked to write either pink or purple. If both students in the real or imaginary pair write pink, the person on the right-hand side of the room gets 50 points and the person on the left-hand side of the room gets 40 points. ("Right-hand" and "left-hand" are defined from the students' point of view.) If both write purple, the person on the left- hand side of the room gets 50 points and the person on the right-hand side of the room gets 40 points. If the answers don't match, neither player gets anything.

To play without the delay tactic, simply ask the students to choose a color and write the choice. Then play again, im- mediately, but explain that you will flip a coin first. If it comes up heads, those on the right-hand side of the room get to write their answers first; otherwise those on the left-hand side of the room write first.

Once you have collected answers from the students, you can discuss the implications of the game. Clearly, it is much more difficult to coordinate without the benefit of the delay tactic and there are two equilibria in pure strategies in the simultaneous-move game. The delay tactic makes the game sequential and creates a first-mover advantage; outcomes from this version often come much closer to complete co- ordination. As usual, you can ask students to try to come up with real-world situations that replicate some of the conditions of the game, or you can provide some examples.

Posted Date: 9/27/2012 4:31:40 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Case study in game theory - color coordination, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Case study in game theory - color coordination, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Case study in game theory - color coordination Discussions

Write discussion on Case study in game theory - color coordination
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
One charm of evolutionary game theory is that it permits for relaxation of the normal fully-informed rational actor assumption. People, or agents, are assumed to be myopic, within

A static game is one during which all players build choices (or choose a strategy) simultaneously, while not information of the methods that are being chosen by different players.

I have a problem with an exercise about Cournot game. It is very complex and it is composed by different question and it is impossible for me to write the complete text. I need som

Games with Sequential Moves Most students find the idea of rollback very simple and natural, even without drawing or understanding trees. Of course, they start by being able to

Strategies against Hostage Takers T ypical Situations Terrorists: usually have several hostages, demands are polit- ical, may be fanatics, location may be public or sec

Game Theory has evolved since its start as a thought exercise for academic mathematicians. Taught in economics departments , top business schools, and the strategic analysis, even

A type of sequential second worth auction during which an auctioneer directs participants to beat the present, standing bid. New bids should increase the present bid by a predefine



A collection of colluding bidders. Ring members comply with rig bids by agreeing to not bid against one another, either by avoiding the auction or by putting phony (phantom) bids