Automaton for finite languages, Theory of Computation

We can then specify any language in the class of languages by specifying a particular automaton in the class of automata. We do that by specifying values for the parameters of the class. In this way, we can regard a specification of those parameters as a definition of a language in the class. Given our assumption of finiteness for the parameters, the definition will be finite.

The specification itself will be a mathematical object-a tuple of values, one for each parameter. We can illustrate this process by applying it to the class of Finite Languages. The obvious algorithm for recognizing such a language is to use a lookup table containing all and only the strings in the language. We then simply read the entire input and check to see if it is in the table. A schematic representation of an automaton implementing this algorithm is shown in Figure 1. The input is shown across the top, written on a tape one symbol per cell of the tape. (The structure of the input is irrelevant here, but will matter when we work with automata that scan the input sequentially.) The ∈ element, here, outputs TRUE iff its first input is a member of the set presented to its second input, so it represents some sort of search mechanism.

Posted Date: 3/21/2013 5:36:48 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Automaton for finite languages, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Automaton for finite languages, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Automaton for finite languages Discussions

Write discussion on Automaton for finite languages
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions

Kleene called this the Synthesis theorem because his (and your) proof gives an effective procedure for synthesizing an automaton that recognizes the language denoted by any given r

Trees and Graphs Overview: The problems for this assignment should be written up in a Mircosoft Word document. A scanned hand written file for the diagrams is also fine. Be

The universe of strings is a very useful medium for the representation of information as long as there exists a function that provides the interpretation for the information carrie

First model: Computer has a ?xed number of bits of storage. You will model this by limiting your program to a single ?xed-precision unsigned integer variable, e.g., a single one-by

implementation of operator precedence grammer

Application of the general suffix substitution closure theorem is slightly more complicated than application of the specific k-local versions. In the specific versions, all we had

This close relationship between the SL2 languages and the recognizable languages lets us use some of what we know about SL 2 to discover properties of the recognizable languages.

De?nition (Instantaneous Description) (for both DFAs and NFAs) An instantaneous description of A = (Q,Σ, δ, q 0 , F) , either a DFA or an NFA, is a pair h q ,w i ∈ Q×Σ*, where

De?nition Instantaneous Description of an FSA: An instantaneous description (ID) of a FSA A = (Q,Σ, T, q 0 , F) is a pair (q,w) ∈ Q×Σ* , where q the current state and w is the p