Automaton for finite languages, Theory of Computation

We can then specify any language in the class of languages by specifying a particular automaton in the class of automata. We do that by specifying values for the parameters of the class. In this way, we can regard a specification of those parameters as a definition of a language in the class. Given our assumption of finiteness for the parameters, the definition will be finite.

The specification itself will be a mathematical object-a tuple of values, one for each parameter. We can illustrate this process by applying it to the class of Finite Languages. The obvious algorithm for recognizing such a language is to use a lookup table containing all and only the strings in the language. We then simply read the entire input and check to see if it is in the table. A schematic representation of an automaton implementing this algorithm is shown in Figure 1. The input is shown across the top, written on a tape one symbol per cell of the tape. (The structure of the input is irrelevant here, but will matter when we work with automata that scan the input sequentially.) The ∈ element, here, outputs TRUE iff its first input is a member of the set presented to its second input, so it represents some sort of search mechanism.

Posted Date: 3/21/2013 5:36:48 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Automaton for finite languages, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Automaton for finite languages, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Automaton for finite languages Discussions

Write discussion on Automaton for finite languages
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions

Suppose A = (Q,Σ, T, q 0 , F) is a DFA and that Q = {q 0 , q 1 , . . . , q n-1 } includes n states. Thinking of the automaton in terms of its transition graph, a string x is recogn

Our DFAs are required to have exactly one edge incident from each state for each input symbol so there is a unique next state for every current state and input symbol. Thus, the ne

So we have that every language that can be constructed from SL languages using Boolean operations and concatenation (that is, every language in LTO) is recognizable but there are r


The initial ID of the automaton given in Figure 3, running on input ‘aabbba' is (A, aabbba) The ID after the ?rst three transitions of the computation is (F, bba) The p

Theorem The class of recognizable languages is closed under Boolean operations. The construction of the proof of Lemma 3 gives us a DFA that keeps track of whether or not a give


And what this money. Invovle who it involves and the fact of,how we got itself identified candidate and not withstanding time date location. That shouts me media And answers who''v

The universe of strings is a very useful medium for the representation of information as long as there exists a function that provides the interpretation for the information carrie