Audit risk, Auditing

AUDIT RISK

As we have seen many parties rely on the audit opinion to make decisions, and therefore it is now a well established fact that if the auditor gives an audit opinion that is wrong in some particular then they stand a chance of suffering some damage.

Audit risk therefore could be defined as the chance of damage to the audit firm as a result of giving an opinion that is wrong in some particular. Or put another way, it could be explained as the possibility that financial statements contain material mis-statements which had escaped detection by both an internal control on which the auditor has relied and on the auditor's own substantive tests and other work.

It could be looked at also as: the possibility that the auditor may be required to pay damages to the client or other persons as a consequence of:

1. The financial statements containing a mis-statement;
2. The complaining party suffering a loss as a direct consequence of relying on the financial statement and
3. Negligence by the auditor in not detecting any reporting on the mis-statement which can be demonstrated.

Damage to the audit firm or the auditor may be in the form of monetary damages paid to the complainant as compensation or simply damage to their reputation with a client or the business community.

All audits involve an element of risk such that however strong the audit evidence and however careful the auditor, there is always a possibility of an error or a fraud going undetected. It is generally known that the auditor who organises his office and staff in a competent manner and follows auditing standards and guidelines is unlikely to be found negligent and to pay damages as a consequence of fraud or error not being discovered by him.

Audit risk can be either normal or higher than normal.

Posted Date: 12/3/2012 5:47:12 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Audit risk, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Audit risk, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Audit risk Discussions

Write discussion on Audit risk
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Litigation and claims ISA 501 Audit Evidence - Additional Consideration for exact Items requires such auditors should carry our process to become aware of any material litig


You are the auditor of ABC Company and the audit process is almost complete. The audit report is due to be signed next week. However, the following additional information on two ma

Managements interest in the accounting system Management needs complete and accurate books of accounts because: There is no other way the business can be controlled; Rec

Existence - Audit Process In the case of tangible assets existence is confirmed through the auditor visually, considering the asset examining and concerned its condition.  Thi

Ownership and Existence - Verification Procedures Establishment of title and beneficial ownership of investments is not convincingly possible. Conversely, evidence is obtainab

State four factors considered determining sufficiency of audit evidence

Fraud and Error ISA 240: the Auditor’s duty to Consider Fraud and Error defines that whenever planning and performing audit procedures, computing and reporting outcomes thereby

You are auditing the accounts receivable balance of a cable television provider. Individual accounts receivables tend to be similar in amount to each other and cover one or two mon

Audit of Current Assets Verification of Work and Stocks in Progress Authoritative documents: IAS 2/ISA 500/501 IAS 1 Preparation of financial statements requires inv