Approval of the scheme - mergers and winding up, Business Law and Ethics

Approval of the scheme - mergers and winding up:

A scheme of arrangement was agreed between Hambros and Hellenic whereby the shareholders of Hellenic were to have their shares in the company cancelled in return for cash compensation.  Hambros was to pay the compensation and then receive the same number of shares in Hellenic.  The scheme was approved at a meeting of Hellenic by a majority in number of the shareholders holding three quarters in value of the shares involved.  But a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hambros (MIT) held 53% of the shares in Hellenic and voted for the scheme.  Hellenic applied for approval of the scheme and was opposed by a Greek Bank, a 14% shareholder in Hellenic.  Its objections were that it wished to retain its membership and also that the cash received for its shares would be subject to heavy capital gains tax liability in Greece.

The Greek bank opposed the approval of the scheme before the court on two grounds.  First, MIT as a subsidiary of Hambros had a different interest in the scheme from the other shareholders of Hellenic.  MIT was Hambros indirectly; it was seeking to acquire the 47% of Hellenic which it did not (through MIT) already own.  There should therefore have been a separate meeting of the holders of the 47% of Hellenic shares not already under the Hambros' control through MIT.  At such a meeting the Greek bank (with 14% out of 47%) could have prevented approval by the required three quarters majority.

Secondly, the purpose of the scheme was to enable Hambros to acquire 47% of the shares of Hellenic.  (The device of cancelling the shares for cash and issuing new ones to Hambros was to save the stamp duty payable on a straightforward transfer of the shares - an example of the advantages of a scheme of arrangement).

It was argued that a scheme of arrangement should not be used in a situation for which the take-over bid procedure was appropriate.  Under take-over bid rules the required 90% acceptance (from the independent shareholders) would not have been obtained since the Greek bank held more than one-tenth of the outstanding 47% minority shareholdings.

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 4:06:59 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Approval of the scheme - mergers and winding up, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Approval of the scheme - mergers and winding up, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Approval of the scheme - mergers and winding up Discussions

Write discussion on Approval of the scheme - mergers and winding up
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
The concept of separate legal personality is fundamental to company law. With close reference to leading cases, explain this concept and its relationship to the doctrine of limit

Define the non-state actors Besides the efforts of ILC in defining a link between the state responsibility and non-state actors, some UNSC resolutions have tried to define the

Economic and Social Council The Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) is a specialized organ of the United Nations and was established, inter alia, to monitor and regulate human

Alan and Brian wished to obtain tickets to the Football Cup Final at Hambley Park, but the owners of the stadium, Stein Ltd, did not wish to allow Alan and Brian to attend the mat

Question 1: Define and explain the essential conditions for the creation of a legally binding contract. You may attempt this question in French. Question 2: "Law is

The impact of behaviour on the policy agenda To see the impact of behaviour, on the policy agenda and outcomes, which is generally not apparent, one way is to focus on the basi

ACCOUNTS AND AUDIT: By s.147(1) every company shall cause to be kept in the English language "proper books of account" with respect to - (a) all sums of money received and

What is the difference between an express term and an implied term? Provide me with an example of each.

Explain about the Stages Model of Policy Outcome Dividing the policy process into discrete steps is also the analytic point of departure for much of the more recent work on pol

Most legal conflicts are settled outside of court, frequently using some sort of dispute resolution. There are times when a party cannot take a case to court until they have made a