Approval of the scheme - mergers and winding up, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:

Approval of the scheme - mergers and winding up:

A scheme of arrangement was agreed between Hambros and Hellenic whereby the shareholders of Hellenic were to have their shares in the company cancelled in return for cash compensation.  Hambros was to pay the compensation and then receive the same number of shares in Hellenic.  The scheme was approved at a meeting of Hellenic by a majority in number of the shareholders holding three quarters in value of the shares involved.  But a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hambros (MIT) held 53% of the shares in Hellenic and voted for the scheme.  Hellenic applied for approval of the scheme and was opposed by a Greek Bank, a 14% shareholder in Hellenic.  Its objections were that it wished to retain its membership and also that the cash received for its shares would be subject to heavy capital gains tax liability in Greece.

The Greek bank opposed the approval of the scheme before the court on two grounds.  First, MIT as a subsidiary of Hambros had a different interest in the scheme from the other shareholders of Hellenic.  MIT was Hambros indirectly; it was seeking to acquire the 47% of Hellenic which it did not (through MIT) already own.  There should therefore have been a separate meeting of the holders of the 47% of Hellenic shares not already under the Hambros' control through MIT.  At such a meeting the Greek bank (with 14% out of 47%) could have prevented approval by the required three quarters majority.

Secondly, the purpose of the scheme was to enable Hambros to acquire 47% of the shares of Hellenic.  (The device of cancelling the shares for cash and issuing new ones to Hambros was to save the stamp duty payable on a straightforward transfer of the shares - an example of the advantages of a scheme of arrangement).

It was argued that a scheme of arrangement should not be used in a situation for which the take-over bid procedure was appropriate.  Under take-over bid rules the required 90% acceptance (from the independent shareholders) would not have been obtained since the Greek bank held more than one-tenth of the outstanding 47% minority shareholdings.


Related Discussions:- Approval of the scheme - mergers and winding up

Nature of a company, Nature of a Company: There is no precise legal de...

Nature of a Company: There is no precise legal definition of "a company". This is due to historical reasons which are too lengthy to be narrated in this text. Suffice it to sa

Contributions of equity, Contributions of Equity Contributions of Equi...

Contributions of Equity Contributions of Equity as: Developed the so called maxims of equity and Provided additional remedies and Provided for the discovery of

Maintenance of capital - raising of capital, Maintenance Of Capital: T...

Maintenance Of Capital: The issued share capital of a company limited by shares is the primary security for the company's creditors. In Re: Exchange Banking Co (Flitcroft's Ca

What objections and should be made, Defendant, Jones, is charged with sever...

Defendant, Jones, is charged with several counts of possession of drugs and weapons. In the early morning hours, a 911 caller reported: "I hear a loud disturbance from Joe Jones' a

Change of name - name clause, Change of Name: A company's name may be ...

Change of Name: A company's name may be changed voluntarily or compulsorily (a)   Voluntary Change A company's name may be changed voluntarily: i. Under s.2.1 if a sp

Entrepreneurship development, In entrepreneurship development, we have stud...

In entrepreneurship development, we have studied various aspects of Entrepreneurship Development, which will help in setting your own workshop. Though all the information has been

Deadlock in the management, Deadlock in the management: The company ex...

Deadlock in the management: The company existed only to "work a particular patent" and as it could not do so it should be wound up. But if there are two or more alternative

Business law , Explain whether Mike should be excused from not performing u...

Explain whether Mike should be excused from not performing under the contract with Jim: Facts Mike ran an excavation business whereby he was contracted by builders to use his exca

Case study, I don''t know how to make a maxim. And my case is

I don''t know how to make a maxim. And my case is

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd