contrary case, Business Law and Ethics

a) Two family businesses are competing in the same industry, and have been bitter rivals since their early days.  The feud eventually extended into the personal lives of each family, where even the children were taught to dislike their rivals since birth.  While stubborn rivalries of the owners intensified, other competitors have steadily taken market share away from both companies.  The old owners eventually retired, and the troubled businesses were taken over by their children.  One day, the president of Company A called for a meeting with the president of Company B.  Surprised that the perceived enemy would do so, the meeting was agreed to.  At the meeting, the two presidents discussed the nature of their rivalry, its history, its negative effects on both businesses and families, and decided that it is best to try to end it.  Teams from both sides drafted up various proposals which formed the basis of cooperation, and a deal was struck.  Both sides were initially suspicious of each other, and the relationship was very fragile.  Neither side knew for sure whether the deal would end up being a takeover plot, an elaborate scheme of corporate espionage, or some trap.  However, both sides also knew that pursuing their rivalry would eventually destroy both businesses and decide to build trust, believing the other meant well.

b) This is a good example of a contrary case because:

  • The fathers of each family developed and nurtured their hostility towards each other, while their children reflected on it.
  • The end of the inherited feud was initiated by a decision to communicate and cooperate, even though each side was weary to trust the other.
  • There were no guarantees that either side will uphold the deal, the deal was motivated by rational necessity for mutual benefit.
  • The motivations of both sides were questioned, and the decisions of both presidents were guided by logic, despite unknowns and lack of certainty.
  • Both sides were willing to take a leap of faith to trust the other side after reasoned and rational consideration of their situation.

c)

FAITH

IRRATIONALITY

Trust

Self-reflection

Connecting over uncertainty

Rational necessity

Path to mutual benefit

Changer of nature of relationships

Catalyst to social connections

Nurtured emotional state

Detrimental to welfare

Emotionality

Inherited way of being

Ill intention

Stubbornness

Posted Date: 2/21/2013 5:27:51 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- contrary case, Assignment Help, Ask Question on contrary case, Get Answer, Expert's Help, contrary case Discussions

Write discussion on contrary case
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Explain importance of Jurisdiction Jurisdiction is  an  important  and  extensive concept  referred  to  and  used  very  frequently in international law. It provides clear n

Rights of Guarantor Against the Debtor Therefore the guarantor's rights alongside the debtor are: like; (a) Before the payment has been made, whereas to compel the debtor t

Companys objects: A company's objects are stated pursuant to the provisions of an Act of Parliament. It must therefore be deduced, for example, that a company whose object has

Nuclear law The importance of international law relating to nuclear law lies in the fact that it regulates, conducts and prohibits the use of nuclear weapons. The United Nation

Define the subordinate legislation briefly. Subordinate legislation: • Regulations: It directly applicable and self-executing, no require for member state to create own

Advantage of the information on the legislature The main result was that voters take advantage of the information on the legislature - executive trade-offs in policy process. W

Function of the Registered Office:                          Section 107(1) provides that a company shall, as from the day on which it begins to carry on business or as from th

1. What is the difference between modifying a contract under common law and modifying a contract under the UCC? 2. What is a "waiver" and what are its implications? 3. What i

The below is a scenario in which I have to make an IRAC for (not sure if you know what that is) but read the scenario and see if "Faye" is able to leave legally without ramificat

Question : Public Relations units in organizations are generally considered as expense centres, as only the input and expenditures can be measured adequately. Therefore, to sec