0-5 No real attempt to address the assignment brief or learning outcomes No evidence of knowledge of key principles, classes and objects Insufficient/no use of analytical skills and reflective practice. Weak presentation and structure, grammar and spelling, links to supporting evidence Little evidence of attempts to engage with module materials and learning outcomes Little knowledge of key principles and concepts 6-10 Adequate knowledge of key principles and concepts Some evidence of understanding of basic concepts/issues. Detailed response to all relevant parts of the question with evidence of clear understanding of the issues. 11-17 Good knowledge or key principles and concepts, Good understanding of the issues. Engages directly with the question. Identification and very good understanding of issues in the assessment. Evidence of reading a good range of educational literature

24-30 No evidence of application of theory in practice Content broadly relevant but with limited or little application of theory into practice Adequate evidence of the application of theory in practice of theory Good knowledge of the application of theory in practice Well-structured with evidence of independent application of reading into practice with supporting the argument. Outstanding use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning. Outstanding knowledge and depth of understanding of principles and concepts and /or outstanding application of theory in practice Evidence of reading into practice through outstanding range of educational literature. Excellent presentation, logically structured, using correct grammar and spelling.

11-17 Good knowledge or key principles and concepts, Good understanding of the issues. Engages directly with the question. Identification and very good understanding of issues in the assessment. Evidence of reading a good range of educational literature Reasonable presentation, completely structured, acceptable grammar and spelling. Generally sound understanding of basic theory and concepts. Content relevant to the question/task. Competently deals with main issues. Detailed identification of the issues with evidence of clear understanding of the issues. 18-23 Excellent use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning. Excellent knowledge and understanding of principles and concepts. Evidence of reading an excellent range of educational literature. Appropriate referencing and bibliography Good presentation, competently structured, using correct grammar and spelling.

0-5 No real attempt to address the assignment brief or learning outcomes No evidence of knowledge of key principles, classes and objects Insufficient/no use of analytical skills and reflective practice. Weak presentation and structure, grammar and spelling, links to supporting evidence Little evidence of attempts to engage with module materials and learning outcomes Little knowledge of key principles and concepts 6-10 Adequate knowledge of key principles and concepts Some evidence of understanding of basic concepts/issues. Detailed response to all relevant parts of the question with evidence of clear understanding of the issues.

19-21 No evidence of application of theory in practice Content broadly relevant but with limited or little application of theory into practice 22-25 Adequate evidence of the application of theory in practice of theory Good knowledge of the application of theory in practice Well-structured with evidence of independent application of reading into practice with supporting the argument. Outstanding use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning. 26-35 Each correct test cases one mark

11-15 Good knowledge or key principles and concepts, Good understanding of the issues. Engages directly with the question. Identification and very good understanding of issues in the assessment. Evidence of reading a good range of educational literature Reasonable presentation, completely structured, acceptable grammar and spelling. Generally sound understanding of basic theory and concepts. Content relevant to the question/task. Competently deals with main issues. Detailed identification of the issues with evidence of clear understanding of the issues. 16-18 Excellent use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning. Excellent knowledge and understanding of principles and concepts. Evidence of reading an excellent range of educational literature. Appropriate referencing and bibliography Good presentation, competently structured, using correct grammar and spelling.

Aspects Range Task Grading Criteria Implementati on of loops and Array 0-5 No real attempt to address the assignment brief or learning outcomes No evidence of knowledge of key principles, classes and objects Insufficient/no use of analytical skills and reflective practice. Weak presentation and structure, grammar and spelling, links to supporting evidence Little evidence of attempts to engage with module materials and learning outcomes Little knowledge of key principles and concepts 6-10 Adequate knowledge of key principles and concepts Some evidence of understanding of basic concepts/issues. Detailed response to all relevant parts of the question with evidence of clear understanding of the issues.

Deliverables Aspects Mark Range: 0-4 Mark 1.1 Proposal Submission • What you will do with the given tasks and the dates by when they will be completed 2 • General overview of initial understanding of solutions to all the tasks 6 • Identification of Literature Resources 2

You need to submit a work proposal for this assignment in the form of a completed Word document on Moodle. You need to upload a final soft copy of your assignment in a word file before the date/time indicated at the Assignment Submission area in Moodle only. Be careful about plagiarism! Refer to the Amended MEC policy on plagiarism in MIG and Student Handbook.

You would be evaluated on the following: • Originality of answer, i.e. writing your own programs • WRITTEN VIVA: Your Assignment marks are based on the WRITTEN VIVA which will be conducted upon submission of assignment during week 14. The WRITTEN VIVA will be based on the tasks given in the assignment. ZERO marks will be awarded to the student if she/he is absent for VIVA. • Proper analysis of given problem, adequate covering of intended learning outcomes and presenting the answers in good, documented form. • Adequate referencing has been done, following CU Harvard style of referencing.

Evaluation Guidelines: The evaluation will be done on the strength of analysis presented in the proposal. You need to submit a work proposal for this assignment in the form of a completed Word document on Moodle before Wednesday, which must include: • What you will do with the given tasks and the dates by when they will be completed • General overview of initial understanding of solutions to all the tasks • Identification of Literature Resources