Illustrate the principles relating to the law of torts

Assignment Help Business Law and Ethics

Reference no: EM131291207 , Length: word count:2100 + 9 slides

Business law - Group Assignment and Presentation

Learning Outcomes:

On successful completion of this assignment, students will be able to:

- Illustrate the principles relating to the law of torts; and
- Explain the principles relating to contract law.

1. Create a group of 3 students.

2. The Lecturer will select a case below to find, read, understand, summarise, and present.

3. The length of the written assignment is to be approximately 2100 Words. (Each member of the group must write 700 words).

4. The presentation slides must be in the IRAC method. Maximum 9 slides, and three short points per slide.

5. Each member of the group is to present the following part of the IRAC method as listed below (I= issues and facts; Relevant laws and principles; A= Arguments of the parties and Analysis, C= conclusion and court outcome).
(Member 1: Issues and Relevant law,

Member 2: Arguments raised by parties and Analysis

Member 3: Conclusion, Court outcome and Role of relevant court)

Note: Although each group member's task is clearly allocated and they are required to present their part, but each member is expected to know the full case and may be asked question from any part of the case.

6. The task is worth a total of 30% of your final marks.

Case Options

1. Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul (1987)

2. ANZ v Westpac (1988)

3. Tabcorp Holdings v Bowen Investments Pty Ltd (2009)

4. Commonwealth v Amann Aviation Pty Ltd (1991)

5. Koompahtoo Local Aborginal Land Council v Sanpine Pty Ltd (2007)

6. Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail authority of NSW (1982)

7. Zhu v Treasurer of the State of NSW (2004)

8. Darlington Futures Ltd v Delco Australia Pty Ltd (1986)

9. Commercial Bank of Australia v Amadio (1983)

10. Louth v Diprose (1992)

11. San Sebastian Pty Ltd v The Minister Administering Environmental, Planning and Assessment Act (1986)

12. Walton Stores (Interstate) v Maher (1988)

13. Imbree v McNeilly (2008)

14. Burnie Port Authority v General Jones (1994)

15. Agar v Hyde (2000)

16. Romeo v Conservation Commission of the Northern Territory (1998)

17. Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan (2002)

18. Nagel v Rottnest Island Authority (1993)

19. Trident General Insurance Co Ltd v McNiece Bros Pty Ltd (1988)

20. Port Jackson Stevedoring Pty Ltd v Salmond & Spraggon (1978)

21. Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) LD [1953]

22. Mobil Oil Australia Ltd v Wellcome Intern'l Pty Ltd (1998)

23. Curtis v Chemical Cleaning and Dyeing Co (1951)

24. Empirnall Holdings v Machon Paull (1988)

25. Modbury Triangle Shopping Centre v Anzil (2000)

26. Roads and Traffic Authority v Dederer (2007)

27. Esanda Finance v Peat Marwick Hungerfords (1997)

28. Fallas v Mourlas (2006)

29. Rogers v Whitaker (1992)

30. Caltex Oil v Dredge (1976)

31. Perre v Apand (1999)

32. L Shaddock v Parramatta City Council (1982)

33. Wyong Shire Council v Shirt (1980)

34. Hawkins v Clayton (1988)

35. Koehler v Cerebos (Aust) Ltd (2005)

36. Horne v Queensland (1995)

37. Peter Joseph Haylen v NSW Rugby Union Ltd (2002)

38. Flavel v State of SA (2008)

39. Tame v NSW (2001)

40. Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Ltd (2001)

41. Hackshaw v Shaw (1984)

42. Baker v Gilbert (2003)

43. Australian Safeway Stores v Zaluzna (1987)

44. ACCCv Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi S.R.L. (No 12) [2016] FCA 822 (20 July 2016)

45. ACCCv Online Dealz Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 732 (21 June 2016)

46. ACCCv Snowdale Holdings Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 541 (18 May 2016)

47. ACCCv A.C.N. 099 814 749 Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 403 (22 April 2016)

48. ACCCv CLA Trading Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 377 (19 April 2016)

49. ACCCv Chrisco Hampers Australia Limited (No 2) [2016] FCA 144 (1 March 2016)

50. ACCCv Australian Egg Corporation Limited [2016] FCA 69 (10 February 2016)

51. ACCCv Bunavit Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 6 (12 January 2016)

52. ACCCv Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 4) [2015] FCA 1408 (11 December 2015)

53. ACCCv Hillside (Australia New Media) Pty Ltd trading as Bet365 [2015] FCA 1007 (11 September 2015)

Reference no: EM131291207

Questions Cloud

Government be your risk management friend : If you've not noticed this yet, our textbook is terribly British in its orientation and outlook on life; this is clearly apparent in the very brief discussions about legal and regulatory compliance regimes that organizations must deal with.

What are alternatives available to cover expected receipt : What factors could influence your choice between these alternatives? (Association of Corporate Treasurers: Part II, September 1989, Paper in Currency Management)

What risks does this create for sun and sand plc : How would you manage these risks? (Association of Corporate Treasurers Part II, September 1991, Paper in Currency Management)

Which firm is more likely to benefit from economies of scale : King Company has decided to establish distributorship subsidiaries in various countries, while President Inc. has decided to establish manufacturing in various countries. Which firm is more likely to benefit from economies of scale?

Illustrate the principles relating to the law of torts : Business law - BBAL201 Illustrate the principles relating to the law of torts; and Explain the principles relating to contract law - The presentation slides must be in the IRAC method.

Concepts from the background materials : For the Module 3 SLP you will again be applying the concepts from the background materials to your own personal experiences. Choose a supervisor that you worked with and got to know well.

Create a project cost estimate and baseline budget : HTC has contracted you to build out a state-of-the-art multimedia classroom for HTC. Assume the space is already built (i.e. you don't need to worry about any construction costs, except where those might be related to pulling cables and other suc..

Why do you suppose countries impose foreign exchange control : Why do you suppose countries impose foreign exchange controls? Do you think that, long-term, foreign exchange controls will encourage or discourage inward foreign investment?

How characteristics of mncs can affect the cost of capital : Explain how characteristics of MNCs can affect the cost of capital ? From an investor's standpoint, have small companies, in general over the past, been more profitable than their larger brethren?

Reviews

len1291207

11/26/2016 2:41:50 AM

Written Assignment: Identify the Issues of the case All the issues are clearly and accurately detailed with reference to cases with similar facts. Written Assignment: Explain the relevant law relating to the case All of the relevant law is clearly and accurately detailed, and the Act and related cases are referenced and discussed. Written Assignment: Discuss and apply the legal arguments raised by the parties in case All the legal arguments are clearly and accurately detailed, and there is a synthesis with the relevant law. Written Assignment: Summarise the judgement of the case The decision of the judge is accurately detailed with reference to any dissenting judgements or precedents. Written Assignment: Illustrate the role, purpose and scope of the relevant court, or tribunal. The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were perfectly clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct.

11/26/2016 2:41:41 AM

Criteria High Distinction 80% - Group oral presentation and visual slides At all times: 1. the group was cohesive and courteous; 2. the oral presentations were clear and understandable; 3. the oral presentations were accurate or precise in relation to the details of the case; 4. the presentation slides were logical and structured; and 5. the oral presentations were interesting and engaging.

11/26/2016 2:40:19 AM

Australian student, 2100 words + 9 slides, Slides need to be on IRAC method Attached is a guideline of business law assignment. It needs to be done on IRAC mehtod. The case study is Koehler V Cerebos 2005.The case study can be found on Austlii. Google Austlii The first link that appears, case study can be searched on that link.Group oral presentation and visual slides 50% Written Assignment: Identify the issues of the case 10% Written Assignment: Explain the relevant law relating to the case 10% Written Assignment: Discuss the analysis and legal arguments raised by the parties in case 10% Written Assignment: Summarise the judgement of the case 10% Written Assignment: Illustrate the role, purpose and scope of the relevant court, or tribunal. 10%

Write a Review

Required(*) Message

User Account

All Pages