Case - delta fire & casualty company

Assignment Help Business Law and Ethics
Reference no: EM13773390

Case Name: Delta Fire & Casualty Company V. William J. Bird and Odell N. Bird

Case Summary: Delta Fire & Casualty Company V. William J. Bird and Odell N. Bird is a 1960 case in the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Orleans. In the case, the court overturned an earlier decision whereby the claimant had to pay the defendants a sum amounting to $264.22 for damages sustained to the defendant's automobile. The appellate court found it necessary to overturn the decision in this case since the evidence suggested that it was, indeed, the defendant who was responsible for the collision and was, therefore, not entitled to damages.

Facts: William J. Bird and Burton H. Himbert, Sr. were involved in a collision on the intersection of Hesiod Street and Phospher Avenue in Metairie, Louisiana at noon on 25th December, 1965. The collision resulted in significant damage to Himbert's car to an amount totaling $264.22. His insurer sought to recover the amount from Bird and his spouse who was driving the car at the time. Several acts of negligence accrued to Mrs. Bird such as entering the intersection blindly, failing to yield way to Himbert, and going over the speed limit set on that stretch of road. The defendants denied that Mrs. Bird had any fault in the accident and asserted that Himbert was the cause of the accident. Indeed, they argued that he had been speeding at the time of the accident. In addition, they claimed that he failed to stop, or control his automobile in such a way as to prevent the accident. Further, they asserted that did not apply his brakes, which would have prevented the accident. Lastly, they argued that Himbert failed to yield way to Mrs. Bird resulting in the accident. The court held that the defendant had been negligent and attached a special plea of contributory negligence to Himbert and his insurer. Importantly, he was unable to recover damages to his car. The judge then dismissed the suit in favor of the defendants to which the plaintiff sought an appeal. In the appellate court, the court found that Mrs. Bird was guilty of negligence. The court also found that she was the one required to yield right of way on that road and that she entered the intersection blindly forcing her into the path of Himbert's automobile, which struck hers on the left. The appellate court ruled that it was her negligence that led to the collision. The appellate court held that the facts showed Mr. Himbert was entitled to recover damages since the defendant could not successfully uphold an assertion of contributory negligence against the plaintiff.

Issue: The question up for discussion was whether the trial court erred in its ruling against the plaintiff. The question becomes important considering that the evidence showed that the accident was the sole cause of the defendant and that the plaintiff did not contribute to the accident in any way.

Reference no: EM13773390

Questions Cloud

Develop the work breakdown structure for the itp project : The purpose of this Individual projectis to develop the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) for the ITP project. This involves hierarchically itemizing all the tasks that, when completed, result in the successful completion of the project defined in t..
Ecosystems-energy-patterns and disturbance : Write a short essay to answer each question you selected. The essays are to be double spaced, and approximately a half to a full page in length each. Many of the questions contain several parts, so make sure that you have answered all parts of t..
Write paper on effects of twitter and instagram on teenagers : Write a paper on The Effects of Twitter and Instagram on Teenagers. What are you trying to achieve with this paper?
The process of continental drift : How do plate tectonics explain natural landforms like the Himalayas and the Ring of Fire in the Pacific Ocean?
Case - delta fire & casualty company : Case Name: Delta Fire & Casualty Company V. William J. Bird and Odell N. Bird, Delta Fire & Casualty Company V. William J. Bird and Odell N. Bird is a 1960 case in the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Orleans
The framework for understanding health care systems : Describe a possible change in one of the domains of analysis in the framework for understanding health care systems and one likely result of that change. Explain your rationale.
Complete the reaction of salicylic acid with water : Complete the reaction of salicylic acid with water - calculate the pH of 50 mL of 0.15 M salicylic acid.
Blending a diverse workforce research : MGT 4 Unit 3.2 DB: Blending a Diverse Workforce ResearchYou are required to research and choose articles relevant to blending a diverse workforce and post the article or link to an article for everyone to read. The post must include a summary of sali..
What are the relevant ethical issues at stake : What are the relevant legal issues at stake? What are the legal rights of the patient and his daughter? What are the relevant ethical issues at stake? Why does capacity assessment matter

Reviews

Write a Review

Business Law and Ethics Questions & Answers

  Legal environment of business caselet

The assignment in Law deals with the topic "Legal Environment of Business". A case study about Mary, a newly joined employee who is working in the USA and Europe. She faces few issues at her work place in Europe and tries to talk to her manager who s..

  Business ethics & legal issues caselet

This assignment is about the concept of Business Ethics & Legal Issues. The laws relating to these can be found in Antitrust laws. These laws are concerned with those large corporations which have a majority of market share, mergers and acquisitions.

  Questions on business law and ethics

Examples of securities that are exempted from the registration provisions of the 1933 Act and involving misstatement of material facts in a prospectus.

  Discuss the doctrine of ratification of pre-incorporation

With the aid of a decided cases, discuss the doctrine of ratification of pre-incorporation contract.

  Discuss the extent of phoenixing activity

It has been estimated that about 6,000 phoenix companies operate in Australia, costing government and the community hundreds of millions of dollars per year and impacting on individuals.

  Application of law to facts

Company Law, Application of Law to Facts and Conclusion.

  Question on business law and ethics

This assignment related to business law.

  Questions on business law

Answer all the questions under business law.

  Iidentify the issue raised by the facts

Iidentify the issue(s) raised by the facts, identify the relevant legal principles, apply the relevant legal principles to the facts, reach a conclusion.

  Evaluation of software development

Prepare a report and present an evaluation of the subsequent methodologies for software development in terms of cost, resources and time.

  Business value and ethics

Business value and ethics,  Bart agrees to put Sam's Super Bowl champion-ship autographed football in his sports store to sell for $1,500. Sam agrees to pay Bart a 15% commission for selling the ball. If Joe comes in the sports store and offers Bart ..

  Explain what is meant by income by ordinary concepts

Advise what tax consequences arise in respect of the payments.

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd