Appropriate test for interval and ratio data

Reference no: EM1320924

Evaluate the data below using the Kruskal - Wallis Nonparametric Hypothesis Test. Explain why you chose this particular nonparametric test to analyze your data.

ANOVA beginnings for population size 30
Y = Exports
Group 1 = n1	Group 2 = n2	Group 3 = n3
Small Area	Medium Area	Large Area
0 - 39,999 KM	40,000 - 499,999 KM	500,000 plus KM
n1 = 13	n2 = 8	n3 = 9
1.24	50.8	325
28.3	7.44	32.8
0.155	63.2	19.6
0.881	25.2	26.5
3.55	2	43.1
0.587	15.8	69
9.22	44.4	55.1
3.13	578	232
38		272.3
2.37
23.1
15.95
181.4

Country	Area (KM)	Exports	Category
French Guiana	91	0.155	small
Guyana	215	0.587	small
Suriname	163	0.881	small
Cyprus	9	1.24	small
Iceland	103,000	2	medium
Bolivia	1,098	2.37	small
Paraguay	407	3.13	small
Uruguay	176	3.55	small
Estonia	45,226	7.44	medium
Ecuador	283	9.22	small
Greece	131,940	15.8	medium
Peru	1,285	15.95	small
Algeria	2,381,740	19.6	large
Columbia	1,139	23.1	small
Hungary	93,030	25.2	medium
Argentina	2,766,890	26.5	large
Czech Republic	79	28.3	small
Venezuela	912,050	32.8	large
Chile	757	38	small
India	3,287,590	43.1	large
Finland	337,030	44.4	medium
Denmark	43,094	50.8	medium
Brazil	8,511,965	55.1	large
Austria	83,858	63.2	medium
Australia	7,686,850	69	large
Belgium	30,510	181.4	small
China	9,596,960	232	large
Canada	9,976,140	272.3	large
France	547,030	325	large
Germany	357,021	578	medium

Small	Rank	Medium	Rank	Large	Rank
1.24	4	50.8	22	325	29
28.3	17	7.44	9	32.8	18
0.155	1	63.2	24	19.6	13
0.881	3	25.2	15	26.5	16
3.55	8	2	5	43.1	20
0.587	2	15.8	11	69	25
9.22	10	44.4	21	55.1	23
3.13	7	578	30	232	27
38	19			272.3	28
2.37	6
23.1	14
15.95	12
181.4	26
Sum of Ranks	129	Sum of Ranks	137	Sum of Ranks	199
Sample Size	n1 = 13	Sample Size	n2 = 8	Sample Size	n3 = 9

Country Size					Export Income Earned

Small	1.24	28.3	0.155	0.881	3.55	0.587	9.22	3.13	38	2.37	23.1	15.95	181.4
Medium	50.8	7.44	63.2	25.2	2	15.8	44.4	578
Large	325	32.8	19.6	26.5	43.1	69	55.1	232	272.3

Obs	Rank	Area (KM)	Exports	Category
1	1	91	0.155	small
2	2	215	0.587	small
3	3	163	0.881	small
4	4	9	1.24	small
5	5	103,000	2	medium
6	6	1,098	2.37	small
7	7	407	3.13	small
8	8	176	3.55	small
9	9	45,226	7.44	medium
10	10	283	9.22	small
11	11	131,940	15.8	medium
12	12	1,285	15.95	small
13	13	2,381,740	19.6	large
14	14	1,139	23.1	small
15	15	93,030	25.2	medium
16	16	2,766,890	26.5	large
17	17	79	28.3	small
18	18	912,050	32.8	large
19	19	757	38	small
20	20	3,287,590	43.1	large
21	21	337,030	44.4	medium
22	22	43,094	50.8	medium
23	23	8,511,965	55.1	large
24	24	83,858	63.2	medium
25	25	7,686,850	69	large
26	26	30,510	181.4	small
27	27	9,596,960	232	large
28	28	9,976,140	272.3	large
29	29	547,030	325	large
30	30	357,021	578	medium

Reference no: EM1320924

Questions Cloud

Verifying whether population proportion is pre-determine : I survey 50 potential consumers regarding their interest in the product, 34 express an interest in purchasing it. The maximum price each would be willing to pay is shown below.

Importance of capacity planning : Discuss the importance of capacity planning in deciding on the number of police officers or fire trucks to have on duty at a given time.

Strategic drivers for housing building industry : Identify, map, and describe the strategic drivers for Housing Building Industry, commencing with the national economy and ending with the market segment customers

Risk thresholds section of risk management plan : Define the probability and impacts section of the Risk Management Plan and justify the values assigned. Define the Risk Thresholds section of the Risk Management Plan and justify the values assigned.

Appropriate test for interval and ratio data : Evaluate the data below using the Kruskal - Wallis Nonparametric Hypothesis Test. Explain why you chose this particular nonparametric test to analyze your data.

Standpoint of the power company : Assume a person is severely injured by electricity while trying to remove a kite from the power line after having climbed a power pole without the utility's permission. The injured party sues the power company. What are good defences from the stan..

Conclusion that the guideline is still reasonable : At the .05 significance level, can we conclude that the guideline is still reasonable?

Most significant challenge associated with leverage : Analyze the ways in which managers could use the Federal Register to determine the single most significant challenge associated with its use, and how managers could address that challenge. Provide specific examples to support your response.

One way analysis of variance in excel : Is there evidence to suggest a difference in the mean waiting times at the four body shops? Use the .05 significance level.

User Account

All Pages